Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The coinvariant dual is the invariant-functional space

Statement

For W=span⁡C{x⋅m:x∈gout, m∈M∙} and CX(M∙)=M∙/W, pullback along the quotient map identifies CX(M∙)∗ with {λ∈M∙∗:λ(x⋅m)=0 for every x∈gout, m∈M∙}. The dual is the algebraic linear dual; no topology or continuous-dual convention is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The algebraic tensor product, outgoing Lie-algebra action, and quotient subspace in Coinvariants and conformal blocks on a pointed curve.

[F1]

Coinvariants and conformal blocks on a pointed curve: CX(M∙)=M∙/W, where W=span⁡C{x⋅m}, and BX(M∙)=Hom⁡C(CX(M∙),C).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Let q:M∙→M∙/W be the quotient map. If λˉ∈(M∙/W)∗, then λ:=λˉ∘q vanishes on W=ker⁡q, so λ(x⋅m)=0 for every x,m.

2.1givenF1step 1.1construct∎

Conversely, if λ∈M∙∗ vanishes on every x⋅m, linearity makes it vanish on their span W. Define λˉ(q(m)):=λ(m). If q(m)=q(m′), then m−m′∈W, whence λ(m)=λ(m′); thus λˉ is well-defined and linear. The two constructions are inverse by surjectivity of q, proving the equality.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources