How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fredenhagen–Jörß local fields glue under refinement
Statement
Let a conformal net and Fredenhagen–Jörß field family satisfy the definitions given earlier on this page. Fix a finite cover of by intervals and a smooth partition of unity subordinate to that cover. For a quasi-primary and , define on If, for each , the partition is refined by finitely many smooth functions supported in intervals with on , then replacing each summand by leaves unchanged for every . Thus the global smearing is well-defined on the stated domain and independent of such local refinements.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite interval cover of , a subordinate smooth partition , refinement functions as stated, a quasi-primary vector , a smooth test function , and .
The local FJ fields are linear in test functions on and compatible under interval inclusion (Fredenhagen–Jörß fields and their energy bounds).
A subordinate smooth partition has and (Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover).
For each , and on . No existence of a refinement is used in the conditional statement.
Proof
Since , each test function is supported in . By [F1], every term is defined on ; the sum is finite, so it defines a vector in for every .
For each , the support inclusion in [A1] gives . By the interval compatibility in [F1], .
Sum the equalities in 1.2 over . Linearity in [F1] and on give Summing this identity over proves the stated refinement invariance on .