Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fredenhagen–Jörß local fields glue under refinement

Statement

Let a conformal net and Fredenhagen–Jörß field family satisfy the definitions given earlier on this page. Fix a finite cover of S1 by intervals I1,…,IN and a smooth partition of unity {ϕi}i=1N subordinate to that cover. For a quasi-primary a and f∈C∞(S1), define on H∞ Yϕ(a,f)b=∑i=1NYIi(a,ϕif)b. If, for each i, the partition is refined by finitely many smooth functions ψir supported in intervals Jir⊂Ii with ∑rψir=1 on supp⁡ϕi, then replacing each summand by ∑rYJir(a,ψirϕif)b leaves Yϕ(a,f)b unchanged for every b∈H∞. Thus the global smearing is well-defined on the stated domain and independent of such local refinements.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite interval cover of S1, a subordinate smooth partition {ϕi}i=1N, refinement functions {ψir} as stated, a quasi-primary vector a, a smooth test function f, and b∈H∞.

[F1]

The local FJ fields are linear in test functions on H∞ and compatible under interval inclusion (Fredenhagen–Jörß fields and their energy bounds).

[F2]

A subordinate smooth partition has supp⁡ϕi⊆Ii and ∑iϕi=1 (Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover).

[A1]

For each i, supp⁡ψir⊆Jir⊂Ii and ∑rψir=1 on supp⁡ϕi. No existence of a refinement is used in the conditional statement.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

Since supp⁡ϕi⊂Ii, each test function ϕif is supported in Ii. By [F1], every term YIi(a,ϕif)b is defined on H∞; the sum is finite, so it defines a vector in H for every b∈H∞.

1.2givenF1A1

For each i,r, the support inclusion in [A1] gives supp⁡(ψirϕif)⊂Jir⊂Ii. By the interval compatibility in [F1], YJir(a,ψirϕif)b=YIi(a,ψirϕif)b.

2.1givenF1A1step 1.2algebra∎

Sum the equalities in 1.2 over r. Linearity in [F1] and ∑rψir=1 on supp⁡ϕi give ∑rYJir(a,ψirϕif)b=YIi ⁣(a,∑rψirϕif)b=YIi(a,ϕif)b. Summing this identity over i proves the stated refinement invariance on H∞.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources