How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal residue is invariant under coordinate change
Statement
For and , formal substitution gives Thus residue of a formal one-form is independent of the chosen formal coordinate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Laurent-series residue convention of Formal Laurent series , their order, derivative, and residue and the group of substitutions in Formal-coordinate change group Aut O.
Formal Laurent series , their order, derivative, and residue: a formal Laurent series has support bounded below.
Formal Laurent series , their order, derivative, and residue: the formal residue is the coefficient of .
Formal-coordinate change group Aut O: every allowed substitution has the form with and .
Proof
For every integer , . A formal derivative has zero coefficient, so this residue is zero. For , write ; then , and the second term is a power series with no negative powers. Its residue is therefore .
Write . Only finitely many terms have , while every substituted term with has nonnegative order because has order one. Consequently the coefficient of in is the finite sum of the monomial residues from step 1.1; it equals . This proves the claimed invariance for every Laurent series, without a convergence assumption.