Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Laurent determinant cocycle has Virasoro central weight two

Statement

Let H=C((z))=H−⊕H+, with H−=z−1C[z−1] and H+=C⟦z⟧. Let Df=−f(z)∂z, for f∈C((z)), act on H, and let d={Df:f∈C((z))} with the commutator bracket. For operators A,B∈d define β(A,B)=Tr⁡H+(B+−A−+−A+−B−+), where Aϵδ:Hδ→Hϵ is the block from source summand Hδ to target summand Hϵ, for ϵ,δ∈{−,+}. These products have finite rank, so their algebraic traces are defined. With no topology or continuity assertion, β is an algebraic Lie-algebra two-cocycle. Its associated central extension is d^β=d⊕CC, with C central and bracket [A+aC,B+bC]=[A,B]+β(A,B)C. For Dm=−zm+1∂z, β(Dm,Dn)=m3−m6δm+n,0. Thus its restriction to these modes is twice the central cocycle in the Virasoro convention [Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+(m3−m)δm+n,0C/12 of Virasoro algebra in the Lm convention. This is a local Laurent-operator assertion; it does not itself identify a global Hodge-line extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed Laurent series space, polarization, operator blocks and trace convention.

[F1]

Virasoro algebra in the Lm convention fixes the bracket and its central normalization.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Since f has a finite negative Laurent cutoff, Df maps H+ into H+ plus a fixed finite-dimensional negative-power space. Consequently its block A−+ has finite rank. Its other off-diagonal block may have infinite rank, but each product in beta still has finite rank because its right factor does. Algebraic finite-rank trace is well defined: a factorization F=uv through a finite-dimensional space gives Tr⁡F=Tr⁡(vu), independent of the factorization by enlarging the finite-dimensional image; it satisfies Tr⁡(CF)=Tr⁡(FC) whenever F has finite rank. No topology on C((z)) is used.

2.1step 1.1algebra

To verify the cocycle without manipulating traces of infinite operators, consider pairs (A,Q) with Q−A++ finite rank. Under componentwise commutator they form a Lie algebra, since [A,B]++=[A++,B++]+A+−B−+−B+−A−+. Its kernel over A is the Lie algebra of finite-rank operators. Its trace-zero subspace is an ideal: its bracket with Q is a finite-rank commutator of trace zero, by step 1.1. Quotienting by this ideal gives a central extension by the trace scalar. The section A↦(A,A++) has central bracket error exactly beta. Jacobi for the commutator Lie algebra and its quotient therefore proves the two-cocycle identity. This also specifies the sign of the extension, rather than invoking an unspecified determinant convention.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

A monomial operator satisfies Dmek=−kek+m, where ek=zk, and [Dm,Dn]=(m−n)Dm+n. If m+n≠0, either off-diagonal product has total shift m+n, so its finite-rank matrix has zero diagonal and zero trace. Suppose m>0 and n=−m. Then (Dm)−+=0 and (D−m)+−=0. The product (Dm)+−(D−m)−+ acts diagonally on ek, 0≤k≤m−1, by k(k−m) and is zero on the other basis vectors. Thus β(Dm,D−m)=−∑k=0m−1k(k−m)=m(m−1)(m+1)6. Antisymmetry gives the negative-m cases and m=0 gives zero. This proves the formula on the Laurent modes. The cocycle on all Df is established algebraically in step 2.1; no continuity or passage to a topological completion is asserted.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra∎

Comparing step 3.1 with F1 gives beta equal to twice the normalized Virasoro cocycle. In particular it vanishes on the three-dimensional span of D−1,D0,D1; the linear term has not been discarded as an unnamed coboundary. Any global use must still identify the determinant line and its isotropy splitting. The computation here proves precisely the asserted local central weight and no global descent claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources