Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pairwise Casimirs satisfy infinitesimal braid relations

Statement

Let g be finite-dimensional with a nondegenerate invariant symmetric form B, let V1,…,Vn be finite-dimensional g-modules, and define Ωij=∑aρi(xa)(i)ρj(xa)(j) for B-dual bases. These endomorphisms of the ordinary finite tensor product satisfy [Ωij,Ωrs]=0 for disjoint pairs and [Ωij,Ωik+Ωjk]=0 for distinct i,j,k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: g,B, finite-dimensional modules and the pairwise operators above.

[F1]

For the WZW specialization only, Integrable WZW insertions on a punctured sphere supplies the normalized form and finite-dimensional top representations; neither is a premise of the general relation proved here.

[F2]

The affine-extension convention Untwisted affine central extension is cited only to record the WZW normalization context. The proof uses the nondegenerate invariant symmetric form B already assumed in the Statement.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

If {i,j}∩{r,s}=∅, every summand of Ωij acts on tensor factors disjoint from every summand of Ωrs. Operators on distinct factors commute, so their finite sums commute.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

For y,z,w∈g, contraction of (ad⁡y⊗1+1⊗ad⁡y)C against B(⋅,z)⊗B(⋅,w) is B([y,w],z)+B([y,z],w)=0 by invariance and symmetry of the form B in the Statement. Nondegeneracy of B makes this tensor zero. Its specialization y=xb is ∑a[xa,xb]⊗xa+xa⊗[xa,xb]=0. Multiply the first tensor factor on slot i, the second on slot j, and sum against xb acting on slot k. Since different slots commute, the first resulting sum is [Ωij,Ωik] and the second is [Ωij,Ωjk]. Their sum is zero. The inverse Gram tensor is symmetric, so Ωij=Ωji; the relation follows for every ordering of distinct indices. All operators act on finite-dimensional tensor products; no completion is involved.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources