How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Basis independence of the Hattori–Stallings pseudo-trace
Statement
For a finite projective right module over a unital -algebra , an -linear endomorphism , and a symmetric linear functional , the candidate value set defined above is a singleton. Hence the pseudo-trace is independent of the chosen finite dual basis.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two finite dual bases and of , an -linear endomorphism , and a symmetric functional .
Hattori–Stallings pseudo-trace: each dual basis satisfies , and vanishes on every commutator .
Proof
Apply the dual-basis identity for to each , then the identity for to each . Right -linearity gives
Subtracting, the difference is a finite sum of commutators in .
Apply to the difference from step 1.1. Symmetry makes every commutator term vanish, so the two dual-basis formulas have the same scalar value. Since the bases were arbitrary, is a singleton.