Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Basis independence of the Hattori–Stallings pseudo-trace

Statement

For a finite projective right module P over a unital C-algebra A, an A-linear endomorphism T∈EndA(P), and a symmetric linear functional ω:A→C, the candidate value set Trω,A(T) defined above is a singleton. Hence the pseudo-trace is independent of the chosen finite dual basis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two finite dual bases (pi,ϕi)i and (qj,ψj)j of P, an A-linear endomorphism T, and a symmetric functional ω.

[F1]

Hattori–Stallings pseudo-trace: each dual basis satisfies p=∑ipiϕi(p), and ω vanishes on every commutator ab−ba.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Apply the dual-basis identity for (qj,ψj)j to each pi, then the identity for (pi,ϕi)i to each Tqj. Right A-linearity gives

∑iϕi(Tpi)=∑i,jϕi(Tqj)ψj(pi),∑jψj(Tqj)=∑i,jψj(pi)ϕi(Tqj).

Subtracting, the difference is a finite sum of commutators [ϕi(Tqj),ψj(pi)] in A.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

Apply ω to the difference from step 1.1. Symmetry makes every commutator term vanish, so the two dual-basis formulas have the same scalar value. Since the bases were arbitrary, Trω,A(T) is a singleton.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 1 level

Sources