Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L2 limits of spherical Gaussian multiplicative chaos test functionals

Statement

Assume the covariance and smoothing conventions of the spherical Gaussian free field and its normalized chaos regularization defined earlier on this page. For 0<γ<2 and every real continuous f on S, the scalar random variables

Mγ,ε(f):=∫Sf(z)exp⁡ ⁣(γXε(z)−γ22E[Xε(z)2])dA0(z)

converge in L2(Ω,P) as ε↓0. Their limit is unchanged when one smoothing family is replaced by another. For real continuous f,h, the limiting functionals satisfy

E[Mγ(f)]=∫Sf dA0,E[Mγ(f)Mγ(h)]=∫S∫Sf(z)h(w)eγ2K(z,w)dA0(z)dA0(w).

The statement concerns scalar test-function limits; it does not assert a Radon-measure-valued version for the full range 0<γ<2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X is a centered Gaussian random distribution on the compact sphere, K has the logarithmic singularity specified by the GFF definition, and Mγ,ε is its normalized regularization.

[F1]

Gaussian free field on the Riemann sphere in the Liouville convention: the covariance is K(z,w)=log⁡(1/∣z−w∣)+log⁡∣z∣++log⁡∣w∣+, paired on tests against the smooth round area measure dArd; the GMC integration measure remains dA0; every pair of admitted smoothings has mixed covariance converging off the diagonal and bounded above by C+log⁡+(1/(drd(z,w)+ε+δ)) uniformly.

[F2]

Spherical Gaussian multiplicative chaos interaction data: Mγ,ε(dz)=eγXε(z)−γ2E[Xε(z)2]/2dA0(z).

[A1]

0<γ<2, so γ2<2.

Proof

1.1F1A1algebra

The covariance bound in [F1] implies eγ2Kε,δ(z,w)≤C1(drd(z,w)−γ2+1) for a constant independent of the two smoothing parameters. The background density dA0 is continuous and bounded in every compact chart, so near the diagonal its integral is bounded by a constant times ∫01r1−γ2dr=(2−γ2)−1<∞ by [A1]; away from the diagonal it is bounded.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

If U,V are jointly centered Gaussian, their moment-generating function gives E[eγU−γ2E[U2]/2eγV−γ2E[V2]/2]=eγ2E[UV]. Fubini applied to the absolutely integrable kernel bound in step 1.1 therefore gives E[Mγ,ε(f)Mγ,δ(h)]=∫S∫Sf(z)h(w)eγ2Kε,δ(z,w)dA0(z)dA0(w).

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The off-diagonal covariance convergence in [F1], the integrable bound in step 1.1, and dominated convergence show that the moment in step 2.1 tends to ∫S∫Sf(z)h(w)eγ2K(z,w)dA0(z)dA0(w) as ε,δ↓0. Taking h=1 in the same Gaussian exponential identity gives E[Mγ,ε(f)]=∫Sf dA0 for every ε.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Expand E[∣Mγ,ε(f)−Mγ,δ(f)∣2] into two self terms and two mixed terms. By step 3.1 each term tends to If with its indicated sign, so the limit is If+If−If−If=0. Thus the regularized scalar functionals are Cauchy in the complete space L2(Ω,P) and have an L2 limit.

5.1F1step 3.1step 4.1∎

For two smoothing families, the same uniform covariance bound and off-diagonal limit in [F1] give the same mixed second-moment limit in step 3.1. Repeating the four-term difference calculation of step 4.1 shows that their scalar limits agree. The limits have the first and second moments asserted in the Statement by step 3.1.

Remarks

The proof stops at scalar L2 limits. Turning the simultaneous family of limits into a finite Radon random measure, and extending existence and mollifier-independence to 2≤γ<2, require additional arguments. The cited lecture notes prove the L2 case and refer elsewhere for the remaining subcritical interval; they are not treated as supplying those local arguments.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources