Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Liouville constant-mode integral and total-charge bound

Statement

Let γ>0, μ>0, an integer n≥0, and α1,…,αn∈R (with the empty sum A=0 when n=0). Let R>0. Put Q=2/γ+γ/2, A=∑iαi, and s=(A−2Q)/γ. Then

I:=∫Rexp⁡ ⁣((A−2Q)c−μReγc)dc

is finite exactly when A>2Q; in that case

I=1γ(μR)−sΓ(s),Γ(s):=∫0∞ts−1e−tdt.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ,μ,R>0 and real charges αi; A and s are the displayed sums.

[A1]

Q=2/γ+γ/2, so A−2Q=γs.

Proof

1.1givenA1algebra

With t=μReγc, one has dc=dt/(γt) and e(A−2Q)c=(t/(μR))s. Therefore I=γ−1(μR)−s∫0∞ts−1e−tdt whenever this improper integral converges.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

The tail at t=∞ is integrable for every real s because exponential decay dominates every power. At t↓0, the integrand is comparable to ts−1, whose integral is finite exactly for s>0; when s=0 it has a logarithmically divergent integral, and when s<0 it diverges more strongly. Hence I<∞ exactly when s>0, equivalent to A>2Q because γ>0.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources