Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restricted affine-current fields are mutually local

Statement

Let g be a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra with normalized invariant form B, let k∈C, and let V be a restricted affine-current module of level k as in Restricted affine-current module for the untwisted central extension of Untwisted affine central extension. Write Jx(n) for the current mode of x∈g at n∈Z, so [Jx(m),Jy(n)]=J[x,y](m+n)+mkB(x,y)δm+n,0IV. For independent formal variables z,w, define Jx(z):=∑n∈ZJx(n)z−n−1,δ(z,w):=∑m∈Zz−m−1wm. Restrictedness makes Jx(z) a field on V, meaning that for each v∈V, Jx(z)v has only finitely many negative powers of z. Coefficientwise on V the commutator is [Jx(z),Jy(w)]=J[x,y](w)δ(z,w)+kB(x,y)∂wδ(z,w)IV. In particular (z−w)2[Jx(z),Jy(w)]=0, so the currents are pairwise local of order at most two. Define the two formal expansions by ιz,w(z−w)−1:=∑n≥0z−n−1wn,ιw,z(z−w)−1:=−∑n≥0w−n−1zn, and define the corresponding expansions of (z−w)−2 by differentiating in w. The notation A(z)B(w)∼C(w)/(z−w)2+D(w)/(z−w) records these singular terms with those two expansions; their first-minus-second difference is C(w)∂wδ(z,w)+D(w)δ(z,w). In this convention the singular OPE is Jx(z)Jy(w)∼kB(x,y)IV(z−w)2+J[x,y](w)z−w.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra, its normalized invariant form, the complex level k, and the restricted current module V.

[F1]

Restricted affine-current module: for every v∈V and x∈g, all sufficiently large positive modes Jx(n) annihilate v.

[F2]

Untwisted affine central extension: the affine bracket is [Jx(m),Jy(n)]=J[x,y](m+n)+mkB(x,y)δm+n,0IV.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

For fixed v, [F1] gives an integer N such that Jx(n)v=0 for n≥N. Hence only finitely many terms of Jx(z)v have negative powers of z, so Jx(z) is a field on V.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Expand the commutator coefficientwise and apply [F2]. In the noncentral sum, reindex by r=m+n; then ∑m,nJ[x,y](m+n)z−m−1w−n−1=J[x,y](w)∑mz−m−1wm=J[x,y](w)δ(z,w). The central sum is kB(x,y)∑mmz−m−1wm−1=kB(x,y)∂wδ(z,w). Each coefficient in the two-variable distribution is a single mode commutator, so these reindexings are coefficient identities.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Index shifting in the defining series gives (z−w)δ(z,w)=0. Differentiating with respect to w gives (z−w)∂wδ(z,w)=δ(z,w), and multiplying once more by z−w yields (z−w)2∂wδ(z,w)=0. Substitution in step 2.1 proves (z−w)2[Jx(z),Jy(w)]=0.

4.1step 2.1algebra∎

The two expansions of (z−w)−1 differ by δ(z,w), and differentiating them in w shows that the two expansions of (z−w)−2 differ by ∂wδ(z,w). Thus the commutator in step 2.1 is exactly the difference of the two expansions of the displayed singular OPE, with coefficients J[x,y](w) and kB(x,y)IV.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources