Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite rational current actions and shifted partial evaluation

Statement

Let V be a strongly A-graded Möbius or conformal vertex algebra and let Wi be strongly A~-graded generalized modules. Let S={s1,…,sk} be distinct complex insertion points and RS=C[T,(T−si)−1:1≤i≤k]. Expand a rational function at a point in nonnegative powers of its local coordinate after its finite principal part; denote this expansion by ιsif. Define DS(v,f)=∑i=1kRes⁡y(ιsif)(y)Yi(v,y),(ρS(v,f)λ)(w)=λ(DS(v,f)w), where the ith summand acts on the ith tensor factor. These are finite operations on each fixed input tensor and on its algebraic dual. They satisfy DS(Tv,f)=−DS(v,f′),[DS(u,f),DS(v,g)]=∑j≥0DS(u(j)v,f(j)g/j!). The transposes have the negative of this bracket. This is a rational-current Lie anti-action, not an assertion of vertex Jacobi on the entire algebraic dual.

For two inputs at a,0, set Ya′o(v,x)=∑mρa,0(v,Tm)x−m−1 and Ya′(v,x)=Ya′o(B(x)v,x−1), where B(x)=exL(1)(−x−2)L(0). These coincide coefficientwise with the transported residue fields. In particular (ρa,0(v,Tm)μ)(w1,w2)=μ(w1,v(m)w2)+∑q≥0(mq)am−qμ(v(q)w1,w2), with a finite sum on fixed inputs.

Put a,b,a+b≠0, let λ∈(W1⊗W2⊗W3)∗ and fix w3. Write μ=λ∣w3. For every f∈Ra,0, put fb(T)=f(T−b). Then the exact finite partial-evaluation identity is ρa,0(v,f)μ=(ρa+b,b,0(v,fb)λ)∣w3−λ∣Res⁡T(ι0fb)(T)Y3(v,T)w3.

Suppose additionally that a linear map F:W1⊗W2⊗W3→W‾4 has the full rational Ward identity: for every v,f and w4′∈W4′, its transposed functional λw4′ satisfies (ρa+b,b,0(v,f)λw4′)(w)=⟨w4′,Res⁡T(ι∞f)(T)Y4(v,T)F(w)⟩. The right side is interpreted by its finite restricted-dual action, not an unrestricted sum on a completed vector. This hypothesis is the complete triple Ward relation. It holds when F is an actual product or iterate of two P(z)-intertwining maps and all its scalar projection sums converge absolutely for every fixed input and restricted-dual exterior vector. In the iterate case use the overlap ∣b∣>∣a∣>0 for the stated nested expansion. No product-to-iterate associativity theorem is assumed in this assertion.

For v of integer weight r, write vj=L(1)jv and λq,u(w1,w2)=⟨q,F(w1,w2,u)⟩. Then g=Ya′(v,x)λw4′,w3 satisfies g+H=R coefficientwise, where Hp=∑j=0J∑q≥0(−1)rj!(p+2r−j−1q)(−b)p+2r−j−q−1λw4′,(vj)(q)w3, R=λYW4′(Cb(x)v,ϕb(x))w4′,w3,ϕb(x)=x1+bx,Cb(x)=e−b(1+bx)L(1)(1+bx)−2L(0). Here Hp is the xp coefficient and both of its sums are finite. The series R has a lower bound on its x powers, uniform when b varies near a fixed nonzero value and the two fixed exterior vectors vary through their finite generalized-L(0) nilpotent families. The same statements hold with the first input fixed and inner positions b,0: the exterior correction uses f(a+b+y) on input one and the full output term is YW4′(v,x)w4′, without the shifted coordinate ϕb.

There is also the delta fusion identity b−1δ(x1−x0b)a−1δ(x0−x2a)=(a+b)−1δ(x1−x2a+b)x0−1δ(x1−bx0), as an equality of absolutely convergent scalar coefficients when ∣a+b∣>∣b∣>∣a∣>0, with the usual nonnegative-second-variable numerator expansions. It does not justify multiplying these distributions by an arbitrary untruncated partial functional; that needs the analytic coefficient bounds for H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The strong gradings, finite local rational expansions, and the optional complete triple Ward identity stated above. No CFT-type, finite-coset or global lower-bound condition is assumed.

[F1]

Strongly graded generalized module in the HLZ setting supplies input module Jacobi, ordinary mode lower truncation, integral state weights, and local nilpotence of L(1) on a state of fixed auxiliary degree.

[F2]

Strongly graded contragredient duality for Möbius and conformal modules supplies the restricted dual and the opposite-field transformation B(x) in this strong-graded Möbius or conformal scope. Each fixed exterior vector belongs to a finite sum of finite-dimensional generalized-weight components.

[F3]

P(z)-compatibility subspace and local grading restriction gives the transported residue convention to which the mode formulas are compared. This definition is not used as a premise that all algebraic-dual vectors satisfy compatibility.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For each local rational expansion choose its finite lowest power q0. On a fixed input vector choose q1 with v(q)wi=0 for q≥q1. Its residue therefore uses only q0≤q<q1. There are finitely many tensor factors, proving finiteness of DS and its transpose on every input. For the bracket, terms on different factors commute. On one factor substitute the input module commutator, multiply by f(si+y)g(si+t) and take the two residues. The jth delta derivative replaces f by f(j)/j!, yielding precisely the claimed bracket. State truncation makes the j sum finite; the local input bounds make its residues finite. Translation and integration by parts give DS(Tv,f)=−DS(v,f′). Transposition reverses operator order and therefore changes the commutator sign.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

At the nonzero point a, ιaTm=∑q≥0(mq)am−qyq, while at zero it is ym. This gives the explicit opposite-field mode formula. In the residue form, the x−m−1 coefficient of a−1δ((x−y)/a) is ∑q≥0(mq)am−qyq, using (−1)q(q−m−1q)=(mq). Thus the residue and mode actions agree for all integer m, including negative m. The finite state family B(x)v=∑j=0J(−1)rxj−2rvj/j! proves agreement of the inverted ordinary fields as well; every fixed coefficient is a finite sum on the inputs. No claim of lower truncation on arbitrary dual vectors is needed.

2.2givenstep 1.1algebra

At the first global insertion the shifted rational function is fb(a+b+y)=f(a+y), at the second it is fb(b+y)=f(y), and its action at zero is exactly the subtracted third-input term. Applying the definition of DS and then transposing proves the partial-evaluation identity. Every operation is finite by Step 1.1. For the reverse partial evaluation there is no coordinate shift: use the same f at the two inner insertions b,0 and subtract its local action f(a+b+y) at the fixed first insertion.

3.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 2.2algebra

Here is a local proof of the complete Ward relation for an actual product F=I1∘(1⊗I2) at z1=a+b,z2=b. For fixed v,w1,w2 choose Ni≥0 such that v(q)wi=0 for q≥Ni, i=1,2, and put Pi(T)=(T−zi)Ni, P=P1P2. Let Q∞(T)=⟨w4′,Y4(v,T)F(w1,w2,w3)⟩ and Q0(T)=⟨w4′,F(w1,w2,Y3(v,T)w3)⟩. Binary Jacobi gives current locality with the first intertwiner after multiplication by P1, and with the second after multiplication by P2. Commuting through both therefore gives PQ∞=PQ0=:N(T). This equality uses only finitely many polynomial shifts at every T coefficient. Every scalar projection sum involved is an absolutely convergent product sum for a fixed modified exterior or leaf vector; a fixed current mode shifts the intermediate weight index bijectively, so those sums can be reindexed. Restricted-dual truncation bounds the highest T power of Q∞, and truncation on w3 bounds the lowest power of Q0. Hence the common series N(T) is a finite Laurent polynomial. The two series are exactly the expansions of the rational function Q=N/P at infinity and zero. To identify its expansion at z1, apply the full binary Jacobi identity of I1 and multiply by P: the target and intermediate-current sides have the common numerator N, since the P2-cleared intermediate current is already identified with the origin series by the second locality identity. Formal delta substitution for the finite Laurent polynomial N makes the remaining side its local expansion at z1. Thus P⟨w4′,I1(Y1(v,T−z1)w1⊗I2(w2,w3))⟩=ιz1N. At z1 the local factor P is yN1 times a unit; the current series has a finite lowest power of y, so division by that factor is coefficientwise finite and injective. This proves the asserted local expansion of Q. For z2, first use the P1-cleared locality of I1, then apply binary Jacobi of I2 and the same division; it identifies the local expansion with the current on input two. All fixed local coefficients again have convergent scalar sums by the given product convergence. Finally, the elementary residue theorem for the rational function f(T)Q(T) says that its T−1 coefficient at infinity is the sum of its residues at the finite poles z1,z2,0. Substituting these three identified local expansions gives exactly the complete Ward relation. The residue theorem here is verified termwise on partial fractions: a term (T−s)−1 has coefficient one at infinity and residue one at s, while higher inverse powers and polynomials have both total residues zero. No external associativity theorem or interchange of an infinite intermediate current expansion is used.

3.2givenF2step 2.1step 2.2algebra

Apply Step 2.2 with f(y)=ym and use the complete Ward hypothesis to replace the global rational action by its output action. Expanding (T−b)m at zero gives (mq)(−b)m−q(vj)(q)w3. Inserting the state factor (−1)rxj−2r/j! and the opposite-field factor xm+1 gives m=p+2r−j−1, exactly the coefficient Hp in the Statement. For the output put T=x−1+b. Opposite duality makes its state factor B(T)B(x)v and its coordinate T−1=ϕb(x). The scaling identity (−T−2)L(0)exL(1)=e−xT2L(1)(−T−2)L(0) shows B(T)B(x)=e(T−xT2)L(1)(xT)−2L(0)=Cb(x). Thus the claimed R is exactly the output term and g+H=R. There are only finitely many states vj. Their scalar factors (−b)j(1+bx)j−2r/j! have Taylor expansions at zero, and ϕb=x times a unit. The field truncation bound on the finitely many vj and exterior nilpotent-family vectors is therefore a uniform lower bound on powers in R. For the reverse identity the global coordinate is unchanged, so the state and coordinate transformations cancel and the output is simply YW4′(v,x)w4′.

4.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

For an actual iterate F=I1∘(I2⊗1), with inner position a and outer position b, use the same P(T)=(T−a−b)N1(T−b)N2. In the outer binary Jacobi identity put y=T−b. Its local current term multiplied by P is the image under I1 of (y−a)N1yN2YM2(v,y)I2(w1,w2). Inner current locality rewrites this as (y−a)N1I2(w1,yN2Y2(v,y)w2), which is regular in y because v(q)w2=0 for q≥N2. Its residue against the outer commutator delta is zero. Thus PQ∞=PQ0 again. The completed inner-input passage has the following absolute justification, avoiding a fictitious bound on current modes of the completed vector: for k≥0 the intertwiner commutator gives v(k)I2(w1,w2)=I2(w1,v(k)w2)+∑j=0k(kj)ak−jI2(v(j)w1,w2). The first tail is finite on w2 and the j tail is finite on w1. For each remaining j, ∑k≥j(kj)ak−j(T−b)−k−1=(T−b−a)−j−1 converges normally when ∣T−b∣>∣a∣. Its polynomial-times-geometric absolute majorant multiplies one absolutely convergent iterate projection sum with the fixed modified leaf v(j)w1. Consequently the joint current-index and intermediate-weight sums are absolutely convergent and may be collapsed before taking residues. The stated regularity argument therefore applies to actual coefficients. As before, the two truncation bounds make N=PQ a finite Laurent polynomial. At T=b, the just-used inner locality identifies its local expansion with the current on w2 after finite denominator clearing. At T=a+b, full inner Jacobi identifies the current on w1; the outer Jacobi has already identified the common cleared numerator in the coordinate y=T−b, so its substitution is polynomial before division by the local unit. The leaf-current coefficients are actual iterate sums for fixed modified leaves and converge by assumption. Thus the local expansions at all three finite punctures are identified, and the same rational residue theorem proves the full Ward identity for the iterate. No uniform truncation on a completed inner vector and no associativity factorization is assumed.

5.1givenalgebra∎

To prove delta fusion, fix a coefficient x1Ax0Bx2C. It is zero on both sides when C<0. When C=0, the left coefficient is b−A−1a−B−1∑i≥0(A+ii)(−a/b)i=(a+b)−A−1a−B−1, whereas the right coefficient is (a+b)−A−B−2∑i≥0(−B−1i)(−b/(a+b))i=(a+b)−A−1a−B−1. The stated inequalities put both binomial series inside their convergence disks. For C≥0, differentiate this scalar equality C times with respect to a and divide by C!, with b fixed. On the left this gives exactly the additional factor (−1)C(B+C−iC)a−C; on the right it gives exactly the corresponding x2C coefficient. The coefficient binomials are polynomial in i or eventually zero, so these series and their derivatives converge normally on compact subsets of the overlap. This proves the fusion identity and its polynomial-times-geometric coefficient bounds. Applying it to H still requires bounding the resulting scalar convolution; no such unrestricted multiplication follows from the identity alone.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources