Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The actual two-dimensional triplet zero-mode plane modulo the endpoint

Statement

Use the actual square-zero triplet module for p≥2. Put N=p−1, h=(2−p)/4, β=(p−2)/(2p), δ=(p−1)/p, ν=p/(p−1), t=e−α/2, w=eβα, b=e(β+1)α, and z=Qt. Set Ap=(3p−2p−1),C0=(−1)p−1(2p−2p−1),G=Q+ν(eδα)(−1). Define Sj(ax) by ∑j≥0Sj(ax)uj=exp⁡(a∑k≥1xkuk/k). The actual vector w′=2ν(C0SN(−x)−ApSN(δx))w lies in the Virasoro cyclic space generated by w, and hence in N2=W(p)w⊂M1=W(p)t. Moreover z∈M1. The two classes tˉ,zˉ in M1/N2 are linearly independent of common degree N. Their span is stable under the zero modes o(X)=X~(2p−2) for X=F,H,E and o(ω)=L~(0), with matrices in that ordered basis o(F)=(0Ap00),o(H)=(−Ap00Ap),o(E)=(00−2Ap0),o(ω)=(h+N)I. Thus the subspace generated from tˉ by these zero modes has dimension exactly two. This assertion does not presume that it is the entire lowest space; that conclusion additionally requires the lower-bound and strong-generation arguments.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The explicit lattice conventions, p≥2, the vectors and constants in the Statement. All operators below act on the actual lattice module; all polynomial identities are finite at the specified degree.

[F1]
[F2]

Admissible triplet action and the Jordan top of the cyclic logarithmic module proves the grading, M1⊂P+ and semisimplicity of L~(0)=L(0) on M1. The sector vacuum degrees are pn2+n and pn2−n.

[F3]

Screening coefficient and nonsection obstruction for the actual triplet projection proves N2⊂M1, the identities [G,F(k)]=H~(k), [G,H~(k)]=E~(k), and G2t=2νC0b. It also proves [Q,(eδα)(−1)]=0.

[F4]

First screening kernel from a finite symmetric-polynomial calculation identifies the degree-N, charge-βα kernel of Q with the Virasoro descendant space of w, and gives the functional Q(fw)=f(−2p,−2p,…)b there.

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

Put d=(eδα)(−1)t and f=F(2p−2)b. The exponential formula gives d=SN(δx)w and f=SN(−x)w: their initial powers are u−N and u−3p+2, respectively, so the indicated coefficients select oscillator degree N in each case. At xk=−2p the generating series for Sj(ax) becomes (1−u)2pa. Hence SN(δx) evaluates to (−1)N(2p−2N)=C0, and SN(−x) evaluates to (2p+N−1N)=Ap. Thus Qd=C0b and Qf=Apb. It follows directly that Qw′=2ν(C0Ap−ApC0)b=0. Applying [F4] proves w′∈U(Vir−)w⊂N2.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Directly z=Qt=SN(x)eα/2≠0. The ordinary F(2p−2) has degree shift zero. Its action on z lands at charge −α/2 and degree N, hence is a scalar multiple of t. To compute it, project its exponential field on z to oscillator degree zero: the annihilation exponential replaces xk in SN(x) by 2pu−k and the initial power is u−p. The coefficient of u−2p+1 is SN(2p,2p,…)=Ap. Therefore F(2p−2)z=Apt. Also F(2p−2)t=0 and F(2p−2)d=0, since their possible output charges −3α/2 and (β−1)α have minimum degrees 4p−2 and p+1, strictly greater than N. Finally Qb=0 and Qz=0 by charge and degree: their possible output charges have vacuum degrees 4p−2 and p+1. Using [F3] gives Gt=z+νd, Gz=νC0b, and Gw′=Qw′=0, since w′ is in the second sector.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Write F0=F(2p−2), H0=H~(2p−2), and E0=E~(2p−2) in this step. By [F3] and step 2.1, H0t=[G,F0]t=−Apt,H0z=G(Apt)−F0(νC0b)=Apz+νApd−νC0f=Apz−12w′. Taking the second commutator on t gives E0t=G2F0t−2GF0Gt+F0G2t=−2Ap(z+νd)+2νC0f=−2Apz+w′. Since w′∈N2⊂M1 and Ap≠0, this proves z∈M1. On the second sector H0 is ordinary, and its zero-mode derivation expression gives H0b=[Q,F0]b=Qf=Apb. Thus the other second commutator yields E0z=G(Apz−w′/2)−H0(νC0b)=0. The deformation of F is zero by [F3]. This proves every asserted generator action before taking classes.

4.1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The vectors t and z are in the first summand, with different charges −α/2 and α/2; z≠0 by step 2.1. Since N2 is in the second summand, their classes are linearly independent. They both have degree N, and [F2] makes L~(0) the scalar h+N on them. Reducing the identities in step 3.1 modulo N2 proves the three matrices. Their span is stable, contains tˉ, and also contains zˉ=−o(E)tˉ/(2Ap). Hence it is exactly the two-dimensional subspace generated under the four indicated zero modes.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources