Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zhu zero-mode identities on singular vectors of an arbitrary module

Statement

For a conformal vertex algebra V of CFT type and an arbitrary left V-module M define Ω(M)={v∈M:a(n)Mv=0 for every homogeneous a∈V and every integer n≥wt(a)}. For homogeneous a put oM(a)=a(wt(a)−1)M, and extend linearly to V. Every oM(a) preserves Ω(M), and, for the circle and star operations and O(V) defined in the Zhu quotient construction, oM(O(V))Ω(M)=0,oM(a∗b)v=oM(a)oM(b)v(v∈Ω(M)),oM(1)=idM. No finite-dimensionality, admissible grading, semisimplicity or diagonalizable L(0) is assumed for M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The module and the explicitly defined subspace Ω(M). All equalities below are applied to a fixed vector v in that subspace.

[F1]

Jacobi and residue calculus from the state-field locality axioms gives the commutator and iterate mode identities from module Jacobi, including generalized binomial coefficients for negative integer upper indices.

[F2]

Zhu algebra of a CFT-type vertex operator algebra gives a∘b=∑j=0r(rj)a(j−2)b and a∗b=∑j=0r(rj)a(j−1)b for a∈Vr; each nonzero summand has its actual conformal weight supplied by F1.

[F3]

Module for an ordinary vertex algebra supplies vacuum and lower truncation. No grading condition on M is used.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Let a∈Vr, c∈Vs and n≥s. By F1, c(n)MoM(a)v=oM(a)c(n)Mv+∑i≥0(ni)(c(i)a)(n+r−1−i)Mv. The first term is zero by the definition of Ω(M). A nonzero state c(i)a has weight s+r−i−1, and its mode index is at least that weight because n≥s; thus every term in the sum is zero too. The commutator sum is finite by state truncation. This proves invariance of Ω(M) under every zero mode.

1.2algebra

For an integer t with 0≤t<r and either d=1 or d=2, the polynomial Pt(j)=(j−dt) has degree t. Consequently ∑j=0r(−1)j(rj)(j−dt)=0. To verify this cancellation directly, put ΔP(j)=P(j+1)−P(j). Iterating the elementary binomial recursion gives ΔrP(0)=∑j=0r(−1)r−j(rj)P(j). A difference reduces polynomial degree by at least one, so it is zero after r differences when t<r. The generalized binomial (j−dt)=(j−d)(j−d−1)⋯(j−d−t+1)/t! is a polynomial also at j=0,1; no positive-index restriction is imposed.

2.1F1F2step 1.2algebra

Take homogeneous a∈Vr,b∈Vs. For the jth circle summand, set m=j−2 and n=r+s−j, the zero-mode index of a(j−2)b. F1 gives first-product terms (−1)t(j−2t)a(j−2−t)Mb(r+s−j+t)Mv, all zero because r+s−j+t≥s. Its second-product term has the fixed b-index n+m−t=r+s−2−t and coefficient −(−1)t+j(j−2t). Terms t≥r are zero since a(t)Mv=0. Summing the remaining terms over 0≤j≤r with coefficients (rj) gives zero by step 1.2 with d=2. Thus oM(a∘b)v=0. All rearrangements are finite: j has finite range, and the surviving second terms have 0≤t<r. Bilinearity proves the O(V) assertion.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For the jth star summand instead set m=j−1 and n=r+s−j−1. The first-product b-index is r+s−j−1+t, which is at least s except when j=r and t=0. This unique surviving term has coefficient one and is a(r−1)Mb(s−1)Mv. The second-product b-index is again r+s−2−t and its coefficient after summing j is −(−1)t∑j=0r(−1)j−1(rj)(j−1t). It vanishes for t<r by step 1.2 with d=1, while t≥r vanishes by the defining annihilation of v. Hence oM(a∗b)v=oM(a)oM(b)v. If r=0, the t<r sums are empty and the same first-product argument still has exactly the one surviving term; thus no exceptional weight-zero case is omitted. Finally 1(−1)M=idM by vacuum. Together with step 1.1 these prove all the asserted identities.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources