How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products of affine algebraic sets have tensor-product coordinate rings
Statement
For affine algebraic sets and , allowing empty or reducible sets, is affine algebraic and the map , , is an isomorphism. Iterating gives the analogous three-factor identification. The argument is choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two affine algebraic sets over .
Coordinate-ring elements are precisely polynomial functions, with equality tested at all points (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).
Coordinates generate the coordinate ring (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).
Proof
Equations for in the first variables and for in the last variables cut out exactly . Multiplying polynomial functions in separate variables gives the displayed algebra map. Every polynomial in the coordinates is a sum of products of such polynomials, so this map is surjective.
For injectivity write a kernel element as with the linearly independent, by eliminating redundant terms in a finite expression. At each , the polynomial function on is zero. Linear independence in the function space therefore forces every . By F1 all are zero. If a factor is empty its coordinate ring and that of the product are zero, so the same conclusion holds. Iteration proves the three-factor formula. Only finite expressions and finite-dimensional elimination were used.