Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact generation preserves the cylinder and closed pushouts

Statement

Kification preserves compact Hausdorff test maps and cubical relative homotopy classes. For CGWH X, the ordinary cylinder X×I is CGWH. If A↪X is a closed inclusion of CGWH spaces and f:A→Y is continuous with Y CGWH, the ordinary pushout P=X∪AY is CGWH; Y→P is a closed embedding and the pushout square is a pullback. These assertions apply to the cylinder attachments and closed-track, cone and suspension quotients below.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Kification preserves compact tests, cylinders are CG, and closed inclusions remain closed under k-products. Kification, compact tests, and finite constructions

[F2]

CGWH quotients are characterized by closed fibre relations, and WH is characterized by a closed k-diagonal. Weak Hausdorff diagonals and closed quotients

[F3]

Products preserve fibrewise quotient maps in CG. Compact-test exponential law and products of quotient maps

Proof

Given: The spaces, maps, and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1F1F2

The compact-test and relative-homotopy assertions are F1. Its ordinary cylinder is CG and agrees with the k-product; F2 gives WH of that product. Thus it is CGWH.

1.2F1

Put S=X⨿Y, P=(X∖A)⨿Y as a set, and let q:S→P be identity off A and equal to f on A. Give P the quotient topology. In the four clopen pieces of S×kS, its equivalence relation is respectively ΔX∪Ef, Gf, Gfop, and ΔY, where Ef={(a,a′):f(a)=f(a′)} and Gf={(a,y):f(a)=y}. These formulas include every fibre: only points of A are identified with points of Y, and two such points are equivalent exactly when their f-values agree.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.2

The sets Ef and Gf are inverse images of ΔY in A×kA and A×kY. They are closed there by F2, hence in the corresponding products with X by F1. The two diagonals are closed. The relation in step 1.2 is therefore closed, and F2 proves P CGWH. Maps from S constant on that relation are precisely compatible maps from X,Y, so F4 proves the pushout property in Top and in CGWH.

3.1F4step 1.2step 2.1

The map j:Y→P is injective. For closed F⊆Y, one has q−1(j(F))=f−1(F)⨿F, which is closed in S since A is closed. Hence j(F) is closed in P. This proves that j is a closed embedding. Set-theoretically X×PY consists exactly of (a,f(a)) for a∈A. A continuous compatible pair from any space has X-component landing in the ordinary subspace A and hence factors continuously there. This proves the pullback property. A closed D⊆X disjoint from A similarly embeds as a closed subspace, since it and each of its closed subsets are saturated for q.

4.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The attaching subspace X×{0} is closed, as are a WH basepoint track and finite unions of such tracks with a cone end. Collapsing any such closed subspace is the preceding pushout with a point. Thus the resulting cylinder, reduced-cylinder, cone and suspension quotients are CGWH. Their quotient products use F3 and retain the fibre coordinate; no whole product subspace is inadvertently collapsed. When A=∅, the formula is simply the disjoint union, and when A=X, it is Y.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources