Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous compactly supported functions are recovered by small ball averages

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Let g∈Cc(Rn) and let x∈Rn. Then lim⁡r→0+Arg(x)=g(x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a function g∈Cc(Rn), and a point x∈Rn.

[L1]

The class Cc(Rn) consists of continuous functions on Rn with compact support. (The spaces Cc(Rn) and Cc∞(Rn))

[L2]

The ball average is Arg(x)=1λ(B(x,r))∫B(x,r)g(y) dλ(y). (The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Let ε>0. Since g is continuous at x by [L1], there is [L1, given] δ>0 such that ∥y−x∥2<δ  ⟹  ∣g(y)−g(x)∣<ε.

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

For 0<r<δ, every y∈B(x,r) satisfies the hypothesis of step 1.1, [step 1.1, L2, algebra] so ∣Arg(x)−g(x)∣≤1λ(B(x,r))∫B(x,r)∣g(y)−g(x)∣ dλ(y)≤ε.

3.1step 2.1∎

Because step 2.1 holds for every ε>0, one has [step 2.1] Arg(x)→g(x) as r→0+.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources