Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian

Statement

Let G be a group and g∈G, with integer powers as in Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e. Then

⟨g⟩  =  { gn  :  n∈Z },

the cyclic subgroup generated by g (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups) being exactly the set of integer powers of g. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G with identity e, an element g∈G, and the set P:={ gn:n∈Z } of its integer powers (Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e).

[L1]

⟨g⟩ is the smallest subgroup of G containing g: it is a subgroup, it contains g, and it is contained in every subgroup containing g (The subgroup ⟨S⟩ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup ⟨g⟩, and cyclic groups).

[L2]

Exponent laws: gm+n=gmgn, g−m=(gm)−1, and gmgn=gngm, for all m,n∈Z (Exponent laws in a group: gm+n=gmgn and (gm)n=gmn for all m,n∈Z, and (gh)n=gnhn when g and h commute).

[L3]

g0=e, g1=g, and gσ(k)=gkg for k∈N; a natural number k in an exponent means the integer ι(k) (Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e, The naturals embed in the integers).

[L5]

Z is a commutative ring, so m+(−n) is again an integer and addition is commutative (The integers form a commutative ring, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals); its order is total, and every x≥0 is ι(k) for a unique natural k while every x<0 has −x=ι(k) for a unique natural k (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3given

P is nonempty, since g0=e∈P, and P⊆G by construction.

1.2L2L5

For x=gm and y=gn in P: xy−1=gm(gn)−1=gmg−n=gm+(−n)∈P, since m+(−n) is an integer.

1.3L3

g=g1∈P.

1.4L3L4L6given

Let H be any subgroup of G with g∈H. Then gk∈H for every natural k: the set of such k contains 0, because g0=e∈H, and it is closed under σ, because gσ(k)=gkg is a product of two elements of H; induction finishes it.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L4

By steps 1.1 and 1.2 and the one-step test, P is a subgroup of G, and by step 1.3 it contains g; hence ⟨g⟩⊆P, since ⟨g⟩ is contained in every subgroup containing g.

2.2step 1.4L3L4L5

Let H be any subgroup of G with g∈H, and let x∈Z. If x≥0 then x=ι(k) and gx=gk∈H by step 1.4. If x<0 then −x=ι(k), so gx=(gk)−1, which lies in H because gk∈H by step 1.4 and H is closed under inverses. So P⊆H.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2L1

Taking H=⟨g⟩ in step 2.2, which is legitimate because ⟨g⟩ is a subgroup containing g, gives P⊆⟨g⟩; with step 2.1 this proves ⟨g⟩=P.

4.1step 3.1L2

Any two elements of P commute: gmgn=gngm for all integers m,n. Hence ⟨g⟩ is abelian, by step 3.1.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1L1∎

If G is cyclic, say G=⟨g⟩, then G is abelian by step 4.1; and every cyclic subgroup of any group is abelian for the same reason.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources