How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dependent choice implies countable choice
Statement
In ZF, the Axiom of Dependent Choice implies the Axiom of Countable Choice: every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Choice function, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Facts & Assumptions
: for every nonempty set , every relation entire on and every there is a function with and for every (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain, The natural numbers (von Neumann), A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
: for every family of nonempty sets there is a function with domain and for all (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). A choice function on the set instead has domain and selects an element of each of its members (Choice function).
For sets and the collection of functions is a set (For sets and the collection of all functions is a set, being a subset of , The power set , The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula , , The Kuratowski ordered pair ); unions and intersections of indexed families are available (, and for ), induction on is available (The principle of mathematical induction, The natural numbers (von Neumann)), and every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle); a natural number is the set of its predecessors, so .
Proof
Given: and a family of nonempty sets.
Let be the set of all functions with and for every : this is a set by [A3] applied inside , and the empty function lies in , so .
Define by if and only if and for every . Then is entire on : given , the set is nonempty, and for any the function lies in with .
By [A1] applied to , and the empty function there is a sequence in with and for every .
For every one has , by induction on from [A3]: , and .
The union is a function: if and lie in , they lie in and for some , and with the relation gives , so .
Its domain is : by [step 4.1] and [A3].
For every one has : the point lies in by [step 4.1] and with .
Put . For each , the set is a nonempty subset of , so let be its least element and define . Then has domain and , so is a choice function on the set of members even when the indexed family has repetitions.
Hence is a function with domain and for every , which is exactly the indexed conclusion of [A2], while is the corresponding choice function on the set of member sets. Since the family was arbitrary, implies .
Depends on
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Choice function
A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain
The natural numbers (von Neumann)
, and for
The power set
The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula ,
The Kuratowski ordered pair
For sets and the collection of all functions is a set, being a subset of
The principle of mathematical induction
The well-ordering principle