How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinguished-subset identities
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let . Then Moreover, for every integer one has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , elements , and an integer .
is the set of prime ideals that do not contain (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
Proof
Every prime ideal contains , so no prime lies in . Every prime ideal is proper, so it does not contain ; hence every prime lies in . Therefore and .
Let . Then exactly when . Because is prime, this is equivalent to saying that neither nor lies in , that is, . The same prime-ideal property shows that exactly when , so .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the stated identities for principal distinguished subsets.