Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Eberlein–Šmulian metrization on the relevant dual ball

Statement

Assume ACω and HB. Let Y be a separable real or complex normed space and let K⊆Y be weakly compact. Then the weak topology on K is metrizable. More precisely, there is a sequence (fn) in the closed unit ball of Y∗ that separates the points of Y, and

dK(x,y)=∑n=0∞2−(n+1)min⁡{1,∣fn(x−y)∣}

is a metric on K inducing its relative weak topology. If Y={0}, the unique metric on each of its two subsets gives the same conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, HB, a separable real or complex normed space Y, and a weakly compact subset K.

[F1]

Separability means existence of an at most countable dense subset, and each nonempty at most countable set is the image of a surjection from N (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset, A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of N).

[F2]

Under HB, every nonzero vector has a norm-one functional taking that vector to its norm, in both scalar fields (Relative dual norming, point separation, and recovery of the norm).

[F3]

ACω supplies a choice function for every sequence of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F4]

The weak topology is initial for the members of Y∗ (Weak topology on a normed space).

[F6]

The standard weighted sum of bounded complete coordinate metrics is a complete metric inducing the countable product topology (The standard weighted metric on a countable product of bounded complete metric spaces is complete).

[F9]

HB is the named real dominated-extension principle (The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF).

Proof

technique · a countable norming family and a compact-to-Hausdorff identification
1.1givenF4

If Y={0}, then K is either empty or the singleton {0}. In either case the zero function dK:K×K→R is the unique metric and induces the only topology on K, which is its relative weak topology. Hence suppose below that Y≠{0}.

1.2F5algebra

On K put δ(s,t)=min⁡{1,∣s−t∣}. This is a metric bounded by 1 and induces the usual scalar topology, because its balls of radius below 1 are the usual metric balls. It is complete: a δ-Cauchy sequence is eventually Cauchy for ∣⋅∣ at every tolerance below 1, so [F5] gives a usual limit, and δ(s,t)≤∣s−t∣ gives convergence in δ.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

By separability, take an at most countable norm-dense D⊆Y. It is nonempty because its closure is the nonempty space Y. The set E={z/∥z∥:z∈D∖{0}} is at most countable and nonempty. It is dense in the unit sphere: if ∥u∥=1 and ε>0, density gives z∈D with ∥z−u∥<min⁡{1/2,ε/2}, so z≠0 and ∥z/∥z∥−u∥≤∣1−∥z∥∣+∥z−u∥≤2∥z−u∥<ε. By [F1], enumerate E as (un)n∈N, allowing repetitions.

2.2F6F7step 1.2

Apply [F6] to countably many copies of (K,δ). The formula D(a,b)=∑n=0∞2−(n+1)δ(an,bn) is a metric on KN inducing its product topology. Its restriction to every subset is a metric inducing the subspace topology, and that metric topology is Hausdorff by [F7].

3.1F2F3step 2.1choose

For each n, let Sn={f∈Y∗:∥f∥=1, f(un)=1}. Each Sn is nonempty by [F2], including in the complex case where the attained value is the positive real number 1. Apply ACω once to the sequence (Sn) and obtain fn∈Sn for every n.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The family (fn) separates points of Y. If x≠y, put v=(x−y)/∥x−y∥ and choose un with ∥un−v∥<1/2. Then ∣fn(v)∣≥∣fn(un)∣−∣fn(v−un)∣>1−1/2>0, since ∥fn∥=1. Therefore fn(x−y)=∥x−y∥fn(v)≠0.

5.1F4F10step 3.1step 4.1

Define Φ:K→KN by Φ(x)=(fn(x))n. Every coordinate fn is weakly continuous, so the initial property of the product topology makes Φ continuous. Step 4.1 makes it injective. Its corestriction Φ0:K→Φ[K] is therefore a continuous bijection.

6.1F8step 1.1step 2.2step 5.1

The weak space K is compact by hypothesis, and Φ[K] is Hausdorff by step 2.2. Hence [F8] makes Φ0 a homeomorphism. Pulling the restricted product metric back along Φ0 gives exactly dK(x,y)=D(Φ(x),Φ(y)), the displayed metric, and its topology is precisely the relative weak topology on K. Together with step 1.1 this proves the claim for every Y and for empty as well as nonempty K.

7.1F1F2F3F9step 2.1step 3.1step 6.1∎

The only countable selection is step 3.1, where ACω selects the norming family. HB is used only inside the individual norming-functional supplier [F2]. Enumeration in step 2.1 is obtained from one at-most-countable set by its supplied surjection and uses no choice. The argument metrizes only the supplied weakly compact K in a separable Y; it makes no metrizability claim for all of Y or for nonseparable spaces.

Source notes

Haase, Theorem E.2, printed pp. 346–347, proves the corresponding compact countable-evaluation metrization pattern for a separable compact subset of a pointwise function space. Here the HB norming family supplies the separating evaluations, and compact-to-Hausdorff identifies the resulting product topology with the weak topology on K. No part of the unavailable Whitley paper is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources