Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Eigenspaces of a self adjoint operator are orthogonal

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a real or complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space) and let T∈B(H) be self-adjoint (Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators). Then:

  1. every eigenvalue of T (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism) is a real number: if Tx=λx with x≠0, then λ∈R;
  2. eigenspaces belonging to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal: if λ≠μ and x∈Eλ(T), y∈Eμ(T), then ⟨x,y⟩=0 (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real or complex Hilbert space H and a self-adjoint bounded operator T on H.

[A1]

Self-adjointness. T∗=T, so ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,Ty⟩=⟨Ty,x⟩‾ for all x,y (Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators, The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator, Hilbert-adjoint identities).

[A2]

Inner-product algebra. The pairing is linear in the first argument, conjugate-linear in the second, conjugate symmetric and positive definite, and ∥x∥2=⟨x,x⟩ (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length); in particular ⟨Tx,x⟩=⟨x,Tx⟩, so this number is its own conjugate and lies in R.

[A3]

Eigen-data. x∈Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI) means Tx=λx, so λ is an eigenvalue with eigenvector x≠0 for the nonzero members of that kernel, that is Tx=λx, and then ∥x∥2>0 by positive definiteness (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[A4]

Scalars. For λ∈F one has λ‾=λ only for λ∈R, and conjugation fixes every real scalar; if ⟨x,x⟩≠0 is real and λ⟨x,x⟩=λ‾⟨x,x⟩, then λ=λ‾ (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[A5]

Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis of this pair's Hilbert-space interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, a self-adjoint T, and eigen-data as in the statement.

1.1A1A2A3algebra

Eigenvalues are real. Let Tx=λx with x≠0. By conjugate symmetry, [A1] applied to the pair (Tx,x) and conjugate-linearity in the second argument, λ⟨x,x⟩=⟨Tx,x⟩=⟨x,Tx⟩=⟨Tx,x⟩‾=λ‾ ⟨x,x⟩; since ⟨x,x⟩=∥x∥2>0 is a nonzero real number, [A4] gives λ=λ‾, that is λ∈R.

2.1step 1.1A1A2algebra

Distinct eigenvalues force orthogonality. Let Tx=λx and Ty=μy with x,y≠0 and λ≠μ. By [A1] and conjugate-linearity in the second argument, λ⟨x,y⟩=⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,Ty⟩=μ‾ ⟨x,y⟩; by [step 1.1] both λ and μ are real, so μ‾=μ and hence (λ−μ)⟨x,y⟩=0; since λ−μ≠0, it follows that ⟨x,y⟩=0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1A3A5∎

Conclusion. Claim 1 is [step 1.1]. For claim 2 let x∈Eλ(T) and y∈Eμ(T) with λ≠μ: if both are nonzero then [step 2.1] gives ⟨x,y⟩=0, while if x=0 or y=0 then ⟨x,y⟩=0 as well because the pairing is additive and homogeneous in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources