Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Charged-fluid current and total stress conservation

Statement

Let smooth fields on an open Lorentzian four-manifold satisfy Strict charged barotropic tensor system, with ϵ taking values in J. Then

ua∇aϵ+(ϵ+p)∇aua=0,∇a(Nua)=0,∇aja=0.

If the planned CP01 tensor Maxwell stress algebra and covariant conservation holds with its stated source sign, then the total stress also obeys

∇a(Tm,ab+TEM,ab)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth fields and equations of Strict charged barotropic tensor system, including g(u,u)=−1, antisymmetric F, ja=cNZua, ua∇aZ=0, and ∇aTm,ab=Fbcjc.

[F1]

Strict charged barotropic tensor system: Tm,ab=(ϵ+p)uaub+pgab, ja=cNZua, N=N∗exp⁡(∫ϵ∗ϵ(z+p(z))−1dz), g(u,u)=−1, ua∇aZ=0, and ∇aTm,ab=Fbcjc.

[F2]

The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive: If an integrand is continuous on the interval between a base point and a variable endpoint, the derivative of its integral function at that endpoint is the integrand value.

[L1]

Maxwell stress algebra and covariant conservation: The current draft CP01 statement, for smooth F,j satisfying dF=0 and ∇aFab=−μ0jb, is that TEM,ab=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd) satisfies ∇aTEM,ab=−Fbcjc. Its actual draft proof differentiates the quadratic tensor by the product rule, uses the cyclic identity from dF=0 to cancel the scalar-invariant derivative, and substitutes the stated Maxwell source sign. The supplier carrier is present but remains draft with precheck pending, so the total-stress conclusion below is used conditionally and its acceptance is not inferred here.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1algebra

Contract the matter balance in [F1] with ub. Expanding the divergence gives ub∇aTm,ab=−(ua∇aϵ+(ϵ+p)∇aua): the term ua∇ap from differentiating (ϵ+p) cancels the contraction of ∇bp, while ubua∇aub=12ua∇a(g(u,u))=0. The force contraction is ubFbcjc=cNZubFbcuc=0, since Fbc=−Fcb. Hence the displayed energy equation follows.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

By [F2], N′(ϵ)=N(ϵ)/(ϵ+p(ϵ)). The product and chain rules therefore give ∇a(Nua)=N′ua∇aϵ+N∇aua=Nϵ+p(ua∇aϵ+(ϵ+p)∇aua)=0 by step 1.1. Applying the product rule to ja=cNZua gives ∇aja=cZ∇a(Nua)+cNua∇aZ=0, using [F1].

3.1F1L1algebra∎

The matter balance in [F1] and the CP01 identity in [L1] have opposite exchange terms, so addition gives ∇a(Tm,ab+TEM,ab)=Fbcjc−Fbcjc=0. This is conditional on the exact draft supplier statement in [L1]; neither its draft status nor this conditional use establishes its acceptance.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources