Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical electrovac dual rotation

Statement

Let (M,g,N,o,F) be a smooth geometric electrovac datum with zero cosmological constant, and let β∈R be constant. Define Fβ:=cos⁡β F+sin⁡β ⋆gF. Then dFβ=d(⋆gFβ)=0 and Qab(Fβ)=Qab(F), so the same metric satisfies Ric⁡ab=2Qab(Fβ). This is a classical two-form identity; it asserts no charge quantization or empirical existence of magnetic monopoles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The source-free geometric electrovac datum of Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization, Lorentzian Hodge star of Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star, and a constant real β.

[F1]

Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization: dF=0, d(⋆gF)=0, and Ric⁡=2Q(F).

[F2]

Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star: on two-forms, ⋆g2=−id⁡ and (⋆gF)ab=12(volg)abcdFcd in a positive oriented chart.

[A1]

β is constant on M, and the background geometry carries only the countable-choice assumptions of its mathematical suppliers; this finite pointwise calculation uses no additional choice.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Since β is constant, dFβ=cos⁡β dF+sin⁡β d(⋆gF)=0 by [F1].

1.2F1F2algebra

By [F2], ⋆gFβ=cos⁡β ⋆gF+sin⁡β ⋆g2F=cos⁡β ⋆gF−sin⁡β F. Applying d and using [F1] proves d(⋆gFβ)=0.

1.3F2algebra

In a positive oriented orthonormal frame let Ei=−F0i and Bi=12ϵijkFjk. The component formula [F2] gives E(⋆F)=−B and B(⋆F)=E, hence Eβ=Ecos⁡β−Bsin⁡β and Bβ=Bcos⁡β+Esin⁡β. Direct expansion gives Eβ2+Bβ2=E2+B2, Eβ×Bβ=E×B, and EβiEβj+BβiBβj=EiEj+BiBj: the mixed symmetric terms cancel and B×E=−E×B.

2.1F1step 1.3algebra

The observer-frame components of the quadratic tensor Qab=FacFbc−14gabF2 are Q00=12(E2+B2), Q0i=−(E×B)i, and Qij=−EiEj−BiBj+12δij(E2+B2), by direct raising with η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1). Each is unchanged by step 1.3, so tensoriality gives Q(Fβ)=Q(F) globally. This proof uses only the displayed geometric quadratic tensor and does not assert an SI normalization.

3.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

By steps 1.1-1.2 the rotated field is closed with closed dual, and by step 2.1 its quadratic tensor is unchanged. Substitution in [F1] therefore gives the same Ricci equation for Fβ, proving the Statement.

Remarks

The argument uses the real classical two-form and Lorentzian Hodge operator. No U(1) bundle, quantum state, magnetic source, or flux integrality is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources