How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical electrovac dual rotation
Statement
Let be a smooth geometric electrovac datum with zero cosmological constant, and let be constant. Define Then and , so the same metric satisfies . This is a classical two-form identity; it asserts no charge quantization or empirical existence of magnetic monopoles.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The source-free geometric electrovac datum of Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization, Lorentzian Hodge star of Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star, and a constant real .
Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star: on two-forms, and in a positive oriented chart.
is constant on , and the background geometry carries only the countable-choice assumptions of its mathematical suppliers; this finite pointwise calculation uses no additional choice.
Proof
Since is constant, by [F1].
By [F2], . Applying and using [F1] proves .
In a positive oriented orthonormal frame let and . The component formula [F2] gives and , hence and . Direct expansion gives , , and : the mixed symmetric terms cancel and .
The observer-frame components of the quadratic tensor are , , and , by direct raising with . Each is unchanged by step 1.3, so tensoriality gives globally. This proof uses only the displayed geometric quadratic tensor and does not assert an SI normalization.
By steps 1.1-1.2 the rotated field is closed with closed dual, and by step 2.1 its quadratic tensor is unchanged. Substitution in [F1] therefore gives the same Ricci equation for , proving the Statement.
Remarks
The argument uses the real classical two-form and Lorentzian Hodge operator. No bundle, quantum state, magnetic source, or flux integrality is used.