Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Helmholtz chart and partial-Legendre derivative identities

Statement

Let U⊂(0,∞)×R be open and let the state relation e:U→R have continuous total derivatives through order two. Fix (v0,s0)∈U with T0=es(v0,s0)>0 and ess(v0,s0)>0. Then there are open intervals V⊂(0,∞) containing v0 and J⊂(0,∞) containing T0, and a unique continuously differentiable function s:V×J→R with values in a fixed neighborhood of s0 such that es(v,s(v,T))=T((v,T)∈V×J). Define the local Helmholtz function a(v,T):=e(v,s(v,T))−T s(v,T). With every derivative of e evaluated at (v,s(v,T)), its derivatives satisfy aT=−s,av=ev=−p,sv=−esvess,sT=1ess,aTT=−1ess,avv=evv−evsesvess. This is a local chart only; no global inversion or state-domain convexity is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open state domain, C2 state relation, and point (v0,s0) with T0>0 and ess(v0,s0)>0.

[F1]

Specific fundamental relation and valid response charts: on an open U⊂(0,∞)×R, e∈C2(U) and T=es, p=−ev; each partial derivative holds the other coordinate fixed.

[F2]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): a real function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on its interior has an interior point where its derivative equals the interval's difference quotient.

[F3]

Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on [a,b] takes every value between f(a) and f(b): a continuous real function on a closed interval attains every value between its endpoint values. Its canonical bisection proof uses no choice principle.

[F4]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): for differentiable maps on open Euclidean domains, the derivative of a composition is the composition of derivatives.

[A1]

All neighborhoods and partial derivatives in the proof are taken in the displayed open Euclidean state domain; no global inverse is assumed.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2construct

Put f(v,s)=es(v,s) and a0=ess(v0,s0)>0. Since U is open and ess,esv are continuous, choose δ,ρ>0 so the closed rectangle R=[v0−δ,v0+δ]×[s0−ρ,s0+ρ] is contained in U, fs=ess≥a0/2=:a>0 on R, and ∣fv∣=∣esv∣≤B on R for some finite B. By [F2] on the two vertical segments, f(v0,s0−ρ)≤T0−aρ<T0<T0+aρ≤f(v0,s0+ρ). Continuity of the endpoint values in v therefore gives smaller open intervals V about v0 and J about T0, with J⊂(0,∞), such that f(v,s0−ρ)<T<f(v,s0+ρ) for all (v,T)∈V×J.

2.1step 1.1F2F3construct

For fixed v∈V, [F2] and fs≥a imply that s↦f(v,s) is strictly increasing on [s0−ρ,s0+ρ]. By [F3], for every T∈J there is s(v,T)∈(s0−ρ,s0+ρ) with f(v,s(v,T))=T; strict increase gives uniqueness in that interval.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2algebra

Take (v,T),(v′,T′)∈V×J and write s=s(v,T), s′=s(v′,T′). Applying [F2] in the s variable and using fs≥a gives a∣s′−s∣≤∣f(v,s′)−f(v,s)∣=∣f(v,s′)−T∣. Since f(v′,s′)=T′, [F2] in the v variable and ∣fv∣≤B give ∣f(v,s′)−T∣≤B∣v−v′∣+∣T−T′∣. Hence s(v,T) is locally Lipschitz and, in particular, continuous.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F1algebra

At a fixed (v,T), let h,k be increments in v,T and set Δs=s(v+h,T+k)−s(v,T). The bound of step 3.1 gives Δs=O(∣h∣+∣k∣). By the definition of the total derivative of the C1 function f at (v,s(v,T)), k=fvh+fsΔs+o(∣h∣+∣Δs∣), so Δs=−fvfsh+1fsk+o(∣h∣+∣k∣). Thus sv=−esv/ess and sT=1/ess. These derivatives are continuous because e has continuous total derivatives through order two, s is continuous, and ess≥a>0; therefore the unique local branch is continuously differentiable.

5.1F1step 4.1F4algebra

By [F4] and the identity es(v,s(v,T))=T, differentiation of a=e(v,s(v,T))−Ts(v,T) gives av=ev+(es−T)sv=ev=−p and aT=essT−s−TsT=−s.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1F1F4algebra∎

Differentiating the first-derivative identities of step 5.1 and using step 4.1 yields aTT=−sT=−1/ess and avv=∂v(ev(v,s(v,T)))=evv+evssv=evv−evsesv/ess. These derivatives are continuous by the stated regularity, so a is C2. All derivatives are evaluated at the chart point (v,s(v,T)).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources