Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Locally integrable functions define distributions

Statement

Let Ω⊆Rn be open and let f∈Lloc1(Ω;C). The regular functional Tf defined by ⟨Tf,φ⟩=∫Ωf(x)φ(x) dx(φ∈D(Ω)) is a distribution on Ω with the LF test-function topology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the open set Ω, the locally integrable function f, and the regular functional from the Statement.

[F1]

Regular distribution from a locally integrable function defines ⟨Tf,φ⟩=∫Ωf(x)φ(x) dx. If K=supp⁡φ, it gives ∣⟨Tf,φ⟩∣≤sup⁡K∣φ∣∫K∣f∣ and states that the functional is complex-linear and well-defined.

[F2]

Test function lf topology universal property states that a linear map from D(Ω) to a locally convex space is continuous if and only if its restriction to every fixed-support space DK is continuous. This holds in ZF.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The functional Tf is linear by [F1]. For each compact K⊆Ω, [F1] gives ∣⟨Tf,φ⟩∣≤(∫K∣f∣)p0,K(φ) for every φ∈DK, where p0,K(φ)=sup⁡x∈K∣φ(x)∣ and the value is 0 when K=∅. Since f is locally integrable, the coefficient is finite, so the restriction Tf∣DK is continuous.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1∎

Apply [F2] to the linear map Tf: every fixed-support restriction is continuous by step 1.1, so Tf is continuous on D(Ω) with its LF topology. A continuous complex-linear functional on this space is a distribution, as claimed. The proof uses no choice axiom and asserts no injectivity result.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources