How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gaussian summability kernels
Statement
Assume countable choice. For put on , . Then , , , and is an approximate identity as . Directly,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , and The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
The Gaussian transform is for (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
The complex Lebesgue substitution formula uses the absolute Jacobian (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).
Dominated convergence passes integrable tails to zero (Dominated convergence).
An approximate identity has unit mass, uniformly bounded norm and vanishing absolute tails outside every fixed radius (An approximate identity on ).
Proof
Apply F1 with and multiply by to obtain . At this gives mass one; positivity gives the same norm. Applying F1 with at frequency proves the displayed inverse integral without an inversion theorem.
Write . F2 gives . This tends to zero: F3 applied to the explicit integer-radius tails with majorant the integrable Gaussian gives their convergence to zero, and monotonicity bounds every sufficiently small t-tail by any fixed integer tail. All three conditions in F4 now hold with norm bound one. Countable choice is inherited from the Gaussian and substitution results.