How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cancellation in a group: or forces ; equivalently left and right translation by are bijections of , so and each have exactly one solution
Statement
Let be a group (Group and abelian group) and let . Define the left translation by and the right translation by . Then:
- Cancellation. For all : if then , and if then .
- and are bijections of (Injection, surjection, bijection), with inverse maps and respectively.
- For every the equation has exactly one solution in , namely ; and has exactly one solution, namely .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group with identity , an element with inverse , and the maps , (Group and abelian group).
The group axioms: associativity, a two-sided identity, and (Group and abelian group, Left identity, right identity, and two-sided identity for a binary operation).
A map is bijective exactly when it has a two-sided inverse map; injective means forces (Injection, surjection, bijection).
Proof
Suppose . Multiplying on the left by and regrouping, .
Suppose . Multiplying on the right by and regrouping, .
For every , , and .
For every , , and .
Existence in claim 3: , so solves ; and , so solves .
Claim 1 is steps 1.1 and 1.2.
By step 1.3 the map is a two-sided inverse of , so is a bijection of with inverse ; by step 1.4 the same holds for with inverse . This is claim 2.
Uniqueness in claim 3: if then by step 1.1, and if then by step 1.2.
Cancellation holds on both sides, both translations are bijections, and each of the two equations has exactly one solution.
Remarks
-
Claim 2 is the form used most often: it says every row and every column of the multiplication table of a group is a rearrangement of , since and permute . Inversion pairs with (In a group , and , the order of the last product being essential), so the two families of translations are indexed by the same elements.
-
Cancellation is strictly weaker than invertibility. A commutative monoid can satisfy both cancellation laws without being a group; is such a monoid, recorded on the companion page.