Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Basic forms descend along surjective submersions

Statement

Let π:Y→M be a surjective smooth submersion that admits local smooth sections. If α∈Ωk(Y) satisfies pr⁡1∗α=pr⁡2∗α on the fiber product Y×MY, then there is a unique β∈Ωk(M) with π∗β=α.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A surjective smooth submersion π:Y→M, local smooth sections, and a form α with equal pullbacks on Y×MY.

[F1]

A smooth differential k-form: a smooth k-form is a smooth section of the exterior cotangent bundle, and smooth pullback is defined pointwise by the differential.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Choose an open cover (Ui) of M and smooth sections si:Ui→Y with πsi=id⁡Ui. Define βi=si∗α. If x∈Ui∩Uj, the map (si,sj):Ui∩Uj→Y×MY is smooth and its two projections are si and sj. Pulling the assumed identity back along this map gives βi=βj on Ui∩Uj.

2.1F1step 1.1given∎

The forms βi therefore glue to a unique smooth form β on M. Pullback along si gives si∗π∗β=βi=si∗α; for any y∈π−1(Ui), the pair (y,si(π(y))) lies in Y×MY, so the assumed identity implies αy=(si∘π)∗αy=π∗si∗αy=π∗βy. Thus π∗β=α. If β′ also pulls back to α, then si∗α=si∗π∗β′=β′ on each Ui, proving uniqueness.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources