Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scheme effectivity and flatness for marked Artin lifts

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. A square-zero sheaf-ring extension 0→M→E→OX→0 of a scheme X, with M quasi-coherent as an OX-module, makes (∣X∣,E) a scheme. It restricts on every affine U=Spec⁡B to Spec⁡Γ(U,E), with kernel Γ(U,M).

Let A′↠A be a square-zero surjection of finite-dimensional local Artin k-algebras with kernel I. Suppose X is flat and locally finitely presented over A, E is an A′-algebra sheaf extension as above, and the multiplication map I⊗AOX→M is an isomorphism. Then (∣X∣,E) is flat and locally finitely presented over A′, and its base change to A is the prescribed X. Conversely any flat scheme lift of X has this precise kernel and multiplication map. Isomorphisms of these sheaf extensions are exactly the marked scheme isomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the sheaf extension and, for the second assertion, the Artin-base data of the Statement.

[F1]

Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves gives H1(U,M)=0 on any affine open; Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules identifies its sections and stalks with a module and its localizations.

[F2]

Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms supplies exactness of tensor with a flat module. Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian says a finite-variable polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian.

[F3]

Square-zero extensions, small extensions and first-order thickenings fixes the base category of finite-dimensional Artin k-algebras and its nilpotent maximal ideals; no splitting A→A′ is part of this data.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is used for bases and the cohomology supplier.

Proof

Given: [F1]–[F3], [A1] and the extension data. Write N=Γ(U,M) and C=Γ(U,E) on U=Spec⁡B.

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

By [F1] the section sequence 0→N→C→B→0 is exact. Its kernel squares to zero, so its prime ideals correspond to those of B and have the same topology. Each stalk Ex is local: an element lifting a unit of OX,x is a unit, since after lifting an inverse their product is 1+n, whose inverse is 1−n for n2=0. Hence (U,E∣U) is a locally ringed space. Define the map to Spec⁡C by sending x to the inverse image in C of the maximal ideal of Ex; this is the preceding homeomorphism. On each basic open D(c), the section c is invertible in every stalk and hence as a section of E there, so localization gives Cc→Γ(D(c),E). These maps agree under further localization and define the sheaf map of a morphism of locally ringed spaces. At corresponding primes it induces a map between exact sequences 0→Np→Cp→Bp→0 and 0→Mx→Ex→OX,x→0. The outside maps are isomorphisms by [F1]; the middle is therefore an isomorphism by a direct kernel and quotient chase. Thus the locally ringed space is affine. These identifications are restrictions of the same sheaf E, so the affine charts agree on intersections and give the asserted scheme, including its exact kernel.

1.2F2F3A1constructalgebra

A flat module V over a local Artin ring (R,m,κ) is free, allowing arbitrary rank. Choose a κ-basis of V/mV, lift it to V, and map the free module F=R(T) to V. The map on associated graded modules for the finite m-adic filtrations is an isomorphism. Indeed tensor exactness identifies mjV/mj+1V with (mj/mj+1)⊗RV, which in turn is (mj/mj+1)⊗κ(V/mV); for F the same formula holds. The map between these modules is the identity on the first factor and the chosen basis isomorphism on the second. Since mn=0 for some n, induction up this finite filtration shows F→V is an isomorphism. This uses no finite-generation assumption on V.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2constructalgebra

On the affine chart in step 1.1, B is flat over A and hence free by step 1.2. Lift an A-basis (bt) to elements of C and form F′=(A′)(T)→C. Its reduction modulo I is the isomorphism A(T)→B, because the multiplication hypothesis says IC=N and C/IC=B. Its cokernel Q satisfies Q=IQ, whence Q=I2Q=0. Its kernel lies in IF′, since its reduction is injective. But IF′→N is the isomorphism I(T)→I⊗AB→N supplied by the same basis and the prescribed kernel map. The kernel is zero. Thus C is free over A′ and is flat. In the reverse direction, if C is flat over A′ and C/IC=B, tensor 0→I→A′→A→0 with C: this gives 0→I⊗A′C→C→B→0. Since I2=0, I⊗A′C=I⊗AB, with its canonical multiplication map. Thus the marking of the kernel is forced, rather than an extra optional identification. The same calculation on stalks proves the converse without assuming that a lift is affine in advance.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For local finite presentation, choose an affine chart where B is finitely presented over A, and choose finite algebra generators b1,…,br and lifts z1,…,zr in C. Every c∈C is, modulo N, a polynomial in the zj with coefficients lifted from A. Its remaining part lies in N=I⊗AB and is a finite sum of elements i p(z1,…,zr). Hence A′[Z1,…,Zr]→C is surjective. The ring A′ is Noetherian because its ideals are k-subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space; [F2] makes this polynomial ring Noetherian, so the kernel is finitely generated. This is a finite presentation of C. Base change gives exactly B since IC=N. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 consequently prove flatness and local finite presentation on an open cover of the constructed scheme. Finally, a sheaf-algebra isomorphism fixes the underlying space and is local on stalks by step 1.1, hence is a scheme isomorphism, and conversely a marked scheme isomorphism gives precisely that sheaf map. The specified reduction of X is retained by composing its unchanged marking; no new reduction is chosen.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources