Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal Lagrange inversion identities for period coordinates

Statement

Let A be a commutative Q-algebra and let f(x)∈1+xA⟦x⟧. There is a unique u(z)∈zA⟦z⟧ satisfying u=zf(u). For every n≥1, [zn]u(z)=1n[xn−1]f(x)n,[zn]log⁡ ⁣(u(z)z)=1n[xn]f(x)n. Consequently, exp⁡ ⁣(∑n≥11n[xn]f(x)nzn)=u(z)z=∑n≥11n[xn−1]f(x)nzn−1. Here [xj] means coefficient extraction in a formal power series over A.

Statement references

Per Berglund, Tim Gräfnitz, and Michael Lathwood, §10, Lemma 10.5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The formal power series ring A⟦x⟧ over a commutative Q-algebra A and coefficient extraction [xj].

[A1]

f(0)=1, so f has a formal multiplicative inverse and log⁡f is defined by its formal expansion over A.

Proof

1.1A1algebra

Put w(x)=x/f(x)=x+O(x2). Writing u(z)=∑n≥1unzn, the coefficient of zn in w(u(z)) is un plus a polynomial in u1,…,un−1. Hence the equations w(u(z))=z determine un successively and uniquely, starting with u1=1. The same coefficient recursion gives u(w(x))=x. Since w(u)=u/f(u)=z, this inverse satisfies u=zf(u); conversely that equation implies w(u)=z.

2.1A1algebrastep 1.1

For a Laurent series G(x) with finitely many negative powers, define Res⁡xG(x) dx=[x−1]G(x). If w(x)=x+O(x2), then Res⁡zH(z) dz=Res⁡xH(w(x))w′(x) dx: it suffices to check H(z)=zj; for j≠−1 the substituted expression is a formal derivative, and for j=−1, w′/w=x−1+(log⁡(w/x))′ has residue 1. Applying this change of variable and w=x/f(x) gives, for any F(x)∈A⟦x⟧ and n≥1, [zn]F(u(z))=Res⁡xF(x)x−n−1f(x)n−1(f(x)−xf′(x)) dx. The residue of (F(x)f(x)nx−n)′ is zero. Expanding that derivative and rearranging the three resulting terms yields Res⁡xF(x)x−n−1f(x)n−1(f(x)−xf′(x)) dx=1n[xn−1]F′(x)f(x)n. Therefore [zn]F(u(z))=1n[xn−1]F′(x)f(x)n.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra∎

Taking F(x)=x in step 2.1 gives the first coefficient formula and hence u(z)/z=∑n≥11n[xn−1]f(x)nzn−1. Taking F(x)=log⁡f(x), whose derivative is f′(x)/f(x) by [A1], gives [zn]log⁡f(u(z))=1n[xn−1]f(x)n−1f′(x)=1n[xn]f(x)n, where the last equality follows by differentiating f(x)n. Since u/z=f(u), exponentiating the coefficient identity proves the remaining equality.

Remarks

The proof is formal and coefficientwise; it asserts no analytic convergence. The commutative Q-algebra hypothesis supplies division by every positive integer.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources