How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal Lagrange inversion identities for period coordinates
Statement
Let be a commutative -algebra and let . There is a unique satisfying . For every , Consequently, Here means coefficient extraction in a formal power series over .
Statement references
Per Berglund, Tim Gräfnitz, and Michael Lathwood, §10, Lemma 10.5.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The formal power series ring over a commutative -algebra and coefficient extraction .
, so has a formal multiplicative inverse and is defined by its formal expansion over .
Proof
Put . Writing , the coefficient of in is plus a polynomial in . Hence the equations determine successively and uniquely, starting with . The same coefficient recursion gives . Since , this inverse satisfies ; conversely that equation implies .
For a Laurent series with finitely many negative powers, define . If , then : it suffices to check ; for the substituted expression is a formal derivative, and for , has residue . Applying this change of variable and gives, for any and , The residue of is zero. Expanding that derivative and rearranging the three resulting terms yields Therefore .
Taking in step 2.1 gives the first coefficient formula and hence . Taking , whose derivative is by [A1], gives where the last equality follows by differentiating . Since , exponentiating the coefficient identity proves the remaining equality.
Remarks
The proof is formal and coefficientwise; it asserts no analytic convergence. The commutative -algebra hypothesis supplies division by every positive integer.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.