Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The matrix-factorization Hom differential is a dg differential

Statement

For matrix factorizations E,F of the same W in General Landau–Ginzburg matrix-factorization data, define, for homogeneous ϕ:E→F of parity p,

DE,F(ϕ)=δF∘ϕ−(−1)pϕ∘δE.

Then DE,F2=0. For three factorizations, composition satisfies the graded Leibniz rule, and identity morphisms are closed. Hence these morphism modules form a differential graded category with Z/2 grading.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sheaf of scalars is commutative, and δE2=δF2=Wid⁡ for every object.

[F1]

A matrix factorization has an odd differential-like map with square Wid⁡ (General Landau–Ginzburg matrix-factorization data).

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

If ϕ has parity p, then Dϕ has parity p+1. Expanding once more gives D2ϕ=δF2ϕ−(−1)pδFϕδE−(−1)p+1δFϕδE−ϕδE2. The middle coefficients sum to zero, while [F1] turns the first and last terms into Wϕ−ϕW=0, since W acts centrally as a scalar. Thus D2=0.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

For homogeneous ψ:F→G of parity q, expand both sides: D(ψϕ)=δGψϕ−(−1)p+qψϕδE, whereas Dψ ϕ+(−1)qψ Dϕ equals the same expression because the two intermediate terms (−1)qψδFϕ cancel. This is the graded Leibniz rule.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Composition is associative because it is composition of sheaf maps, and for each E, D(id⁡E)=δE−δE=0. Together with [step 1.1], the morphism differential squares to zero and preserves the identities, proving the dg-category axioms.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 1 level

Sources