Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Hamiltonian evolution preserves the symplectic form

Statement

Let I⊆R be an open interval, let (M,ω) be a smooth symplectic manifold, and let H:I×M→R be smooth. Write Ht(p)=H(t,p) and define XHt by ιXHtω=−dMHt, where dM differentiates only in the M variable. If Φt,s is the smooth local evolution satisfying ∂tΦt,s(p)=XHt(Φt,s(p)) and Φs,s(p)=p on its domain, then Φt,s∗ω=ω wherever that evolution is defined. This is local and asserts no global completeness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth symplectic manifold, smooth Ht, the field XHt determined by contraction with ω, and a smooth local evolution of that field.

[F1]

Symplectic form and symplectic manifold: dω=0 and ω♭ is pointwise invertible.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

In local coordinates write ω=12ωabdxa∧dxb, X=Xc∂c, and Φt=Φt,s. Differentiating (Φt∗ω)ij=ωab(Φt)∂iΦta∂jΦtb and using ∂tΦta=Xa(Φt) and ∂t∂iΦta=(∂cXa)(Φt)∂iΦtc gives ∂t(Φt∗ω)ij=(Xc∂cωab+ωcb∂aXc+ωac∂bXc)(Φt)∂iΦta∂jΦtb. The bracket is the coordinate expression for the Lie derivative LXω.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

In the same coordinates,

(d(ιXω))ij=(∂iXk)ωkj+Xk∂iωkj−(∂jXk)ωki−Xk∂jωki,

and

(ιXdω)ij=Xk(∂kωij+∂iωjk+∂jωki).

Adding them cancels −Xk∂jωki with Xk∂jωki and cancels Xk∂iωkj with Xk∂iωjk because ωkj=−ωjk. The remaining terms are Xk∂kωij+(∂iXk)ωkj+(∂jXk)ωik, exactly the coordinate expression in step 1.1. Hence LXω=d(ιXω)+ιXdω. Since ιXω=−dHt and dω=0 by [F1], both terms vanish and LXω=0.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Step 1.1 now gives ∂tΦt,s∗ω=0 on the local evolution domain. At t=s, Φs,s is the identity, so the pullback is ω throughout that domain.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources