Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Small-extension comparison for nilpotent Maurer–Cartan gauge classes

Statement

Let f:L→M be a morphism of cohomological differential graded Lie algebras over a characteristic-zero field k. Suppose H0(f) is surjective, H1(f) is bijective, and H2(f) is injective. For a finite-dimensional commutative local Artin k-algebra R with residue field k and maximal ideal mR, put MC⁡L(R)={x∈L1⊗kmR:dx+12[x,x]=0}. The nilpotent exponential group exp⁡(L0⊗kmR), with Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff multiplication, acts by ea∗x=ead⁡ax−∑n≥0(ad⁡a)n(n+1)! da. All series are finite because mR is nilpotent. The map induced by f on the sets of gauge orbits is bijective for every R, naturally in all local k-algebra morphisms. This assertion concerns these Maurer–Cartan orbit functors; identifying a scheme or Morita deformation functor with either orbit functor is a separate prerequisite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f, L, M, k, and their stated cohomology maps.

[F1]

Cohomological differential graded Lie algebra supplies the differential, signed Jacobi identity, differential Leibniz rule, and morphism convention.

Proof

Given: the data in the Statement and [F1].

1.1F1algebra

Adjoin a formal degree-one element D to L, with [D,u]=du and [D,D]=0. The differential Leibniz rule and d2=0 give the Jacobi identity for this extension. A Maurer–Cartan element satisfies [D+x,D+x]=0. Conjugation by ead⁡a carries D+x to D+ea∗x, with the displayed formula obtained by expanding the exponential and using [a,D]=−da. Thus the formula preserves Maurer–Cartan elements and gives a group action. The exponential composition identity is the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff identity; here it is a finite identity, evaluated in the nilpotent ideal of coefficients. In particular, if a∈L0⊗I and mRI=0, then ea∗x=x−da.

1.2F1algebra

We need the stabilizers over the whole base, not only the kernel gauges. For a local Artin k-algebra B, fix z∈MC⁡L(B) and put dz=d+[z,−] on L⊗mB and df(z)=d+[f(z),−] on M⊗mB. Their squares vanish by the Maurer–Cartan equation and Jacobi identity. Form the mapping cone Ci=(Mi⊗mB)⊕(Li+1⊗mB) with differential (b,a)↦(df(z)b+f(a),−dza). Filter by powers of mB. Its associated graded pieces are the ordinary cone of f tensored with mBj/mBj+1. Each has zero degree-zero cohomology: a cocycle (b,a) has da=0 and db=−f(a); injectivity of H1(f) gives a=dv, and surjectivity of H0(f) then expresses b+f(v) as f(w)+du with dw=0, which makes (b,a) a cone boundary. The finite filtration therefore also has H0(C)=0: subtract a primitive of the leading filtered term of any degree-zero cocycle, and repeat until the filtration vanishes. Applying this to (b,0) proves that every df(z)-closed degree-zero b is f(a)+df(z)c, with dza=0 and c∈M−1⊗mB.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Let R↠B have kernel I with mRI=0, and let xB∈MC⁡L(B). For any linear lift x~∈L1⊗mR, its curvature c=dx~+12[x~,x~] lies in L2⊗I. The differential Leibniz rule and Jacobi identity give dc+[x~,c]=0; the second term vanishes because mRI=0. Replacing x~ by x~+u, with u∈L1⊗I, replaces c by c+du. Thus [c]∈H2(L)⊗I is independent of the lift, vanishes exactly when a Maurer–Cartan lift exists, and maps to the corresponding class for M. If a lift x exists, every other lift is uniquely x+u with u∈Z1(L)⊗I; quotienting by gauges reducing to the identity over B identifies u modulo d(L0⊗I), giving a torsor under H1(L)⊗I. Gauges in this kernel which fix x are exactly Z0(L)⊗I. These are assertions with a fixed reduction representative, before quotienting by stabilizers over B.

2.2F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The stabilizer of z is exp⁡Z0(L⊗mB,dz). Indeed the difference ea∗z−z is −P(ad⁡a)dza, where P(t)=∑n≥0tn/(n+1)! is invertible because its constant term is one and ad⁡a is nilpotent. Boundaries dz(L−1⊗mB) form a Lie ideal in these closed degree-zero elements, since [u,dzv]=dz[u,v] when dzu=0. Exponentiating that ideal gives a normal stabilizer subgroup. The quotient is the exponential group of the degree-zero cohomology Lie algebra, as follows by applying the finite Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula to the quotient by the ideal. Step 1.2 makes the map on these quotient groups surjective. Consequently every target stabilizer is a product f(h)k where h is a source stabilizer and k=exp⁡(df(z)c) is a boundary stabilizer. If z lifts to x over R, any lift of c gives the boundary stabilizer exp⁡(df(x)c~) of f(x) over R, lifting k.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Induct on dim⁡kR. For R=k both orbit sets have one element. For R≠k, choose a one-dimensional k-subspace I in the last nonzero power of mR. It is an ideal annihilated by mR; write B=R/I. Given y∈MC⁡M(R), induction supplies xB∈MC⁡L(B) and a target gauge identifying f(xB) with yB. Lift that gauge linearly to R and apply its inverse to y, so yB=f(xB). The curvature obstruction of xB maps to zero because y exists. Injectivity of H2(f)⊗I and step 2.1 give a lift x∈MC⁡L(R). The difference y−f(x) is closed in M1⊗I. Surjectivity of H1(f)⊗I writes it as f(u)−dv, with u∈Z1(L)⊗I and v∈M0⊗I. Then x+u is Maurer–Cartan and ev∗f(x+u)=y. This proves surjectivity on orbits.

4.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

For injectivity let x,y∈MC⁡L(R) and g∗f(x)=f(y). Induction gives a source gauge carrying xB to yB. Lift it and replace x by its action, adjusting g accordingly; now xB=yB=z, and gB stabilizes f(z). By step 2.2 write gB=f(h)k. Lift k to a boundary stabilizer k~ of f(x), and lift h to an arbitrary source gauge h~. Replace x by h~∗x and g by gk~−1f(h~)−1. This retains g∗f(x)=f(y) and makes gB=1. Hence g=ev for v∈M0⊗I and f(y−x)=−dv. The difference y−x is closed in L1⊗I, so injectivity of H1(f)⊗I writes y−x=−da for some a∈L0⊗I. Therefore ea∗x=y. This completes the induction and proves injectivity on orbits.

5.1F1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

A morphism of Artin bases sends maximal ideals to maximal ideals and commutes with d, the bracket, and every finite exponential term. It therefore induces the orbit maps, and these commute with the maps induced by f. The bijections proved above consequently form a natural isomorphism. No choice of a small-extension filtration occurs in the definition of this transformation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources