How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tilt derived-dual truncation and canonical finite saturation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and let have the preceding smooth projective threefold conventions. Put . For every real and every in this subcategory, is reflexive with all slopes strictly less than , has standard coherent cohomology only in degrees , and is zero-dimensional. Its standard truncation lies in . There is a canonical exact sequence in , with . Every exact with zero-dimensional and having no nonzero zero-dimensional subobject has a unique injection over ; in particular . For an exact sequence of finite-part objects, the precise dual sequence is in . The first three Chern coordinates transform by , while . No tilt-HN theorem, ordinary BG inequality, or polynomial-stability duality is assumed.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Full Axiom of Choice is retained from the actual coherent and regular-local suppliers.
The exact mathematical inputs are Coherent duality and rational slope-tilt heart noetherianity, The Chern character and the Todd class, The Axiom of Choice. Their supplied interfaces are used below; no external tilt, polynomial-stability, or derived-dual theorem is assumed.
Proof
Given: Exactly the geometric data and explicit hypotheses of the Statement.
Let β be real and . Write , . Then F is reflexive and when F≠0. In fact is supported in dimension at most one; and the exact coherent sequence gives a monomorphism Q→F[1]→E in . Since , it vanishes. Similarly a nonzero HN boundary part of F of slope β gives a monomorphism of its shift into E from , impossible. This proves both assertions.
We claim that D(E) has standard cohomology only in degrees −1,0,1, with zero-dimensional. Initially it has no cohomology below −1 or above 2: dualize F[1]→E→T, use regular-local dimension three and torsion-freeness of F (depth at least one, projective dimension at most two). Its is supported at closed points by local global dimension. If were nonzero, its quotient to a residue-field sheaf would give a nonzero composite . Applying the involutive D produces a nonzero map k(x)^D→E, contradicting . Hence .
Let . At a point of codimension at most one, F is free and T has projective dimension at most one, so the same triangle gives no . Therefore G is supported in dimension at most one. If its one-dimensional part were nonzero, consider the canonical map D(E)→G[−1] and dualize. The source D(G[−1]) has cohomology in degree zero and in degree one. Thus the canonical map K→D(G[−1])→E exists. At a generic codimension-two point where G is nonzero, the local ring is regular of dimension two and G has finite length; Koszul duality and finite-length dévissage show that D(G[−1]) there is exactly its nonzero Ext² module. The map is nonzero there, since the original truncation map induces an isomorphism on its highest cohomology and derived duality is faithful. This yields a nonzero map from K, a dimension-at-most-one sheaf, to E, again impossible. Hence G is zero-dimensional.
Define
D(E), D(E).
This gives a canonical triangle . We now prove , not just that it is a two-term complex. Dualizing the cohomology triangle gives . Its maximal slope is less than −β by ordinary slope duality on T's torsion-free quotient, so it belongs to . Also fits into an exact sequence with a torsion image of as its subobject and an image K inside F* as its quotient; F*/K is supported in codimension at least two, being a subsheaf of . The HN slopes of K equal those of F*, whose minimum exceeds −β. Thus . This proves the asserted heart membership. The statement remains valid when F or T is zero.
Dualize the last triangle. Since , it gives a canonical exact sequence in
.
In particular has standard cohomology only in degrees −1,0. For any K of dimension at most one,
,
because has cohomology in degrees at most zero and D(K) in degrees at least one. For a torsion-free slope-semistable G of slope β, a map factors through E: by negative ordinary Ext. It is therefore zero. Every object of is an extension of such a G[1] by a dimension-at-most-one sheaf. Thus .
The dual truncation itself lies in . For K of dimension at most one, use by the same standard degree argument. For a slope-semistable G of slope −β,
.
The standard degree-zero term G* has slope β, so and by negative-heart orthogonality. The remaining terms of have standard cohomology in degrees at least one, giving no maps from . This proves the other necessary Hom vanishing, and hence the finite-part assertion.
The saturation is finite and universal. Given 0→E→U→Z→0 in with Z zero-dimensional and with no nonzero zero-dimensional subobject of U, every of U has intersection zero with E and hence injects into Z; it would be zero-dimensional, so must vanish. Thus . Since , the dual map induces a canonical isomorphism . Apply the preceding saturation construction to U to obtain the canonical injection over E. It is unique: two such maps differ by a map , which is zero. Consequently , uniformly for every such extension. No existence of a maximal extension is assumed; is constructed by two actual derived duals and one standard truncation.
Functoriality also gives the exact dual sequence. From an exact 0→A→E→B→0 of finite-part objects, take tilted cohomology of D(B)→D(E)→D(A). Because each D object is its dual truncation plus a zero-dimensional degree-one term, the result is
in . In particular the injection of the dual of a finite-part quotient is genuine; no dual of an arbitrary heart exact sequence is claimed exact without the defect terms. The first three numerical coordinates transform as (C0,C1,C2)↦(−C0,C1,−C2); .