Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tilt derived-dual truncation and canonical finite saturation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let X,H,v,Bβ,Cβ,D have the preceding smooth projective threefold conventions. Put Bβfin={E∈Bβ:Hom⁡(C,E)=0 for every C∈Cβ}. For every real β and every E in this subcategory, H−1(E) is reflexive with all slopes strictly less than β, D(E) has standard coherent cohomology only in degrees −1,0,1, and TE=H1(D(E)) is zero-dimensional. Its standard truncation Ed=τ≤0D(E) lies in B−βfin. There is a canonical exact sequence 0→E→Esat:=D(Ed)→TED→0 in Bβ, with Esat∈Bβfin. Every exact 0→E→U→Z→0 with Z zero-dimensional and U having no nonzero zero-dimensional subobject has a unique injection U→Esat over E; in particular length⁡(U/E)≤length⁡(TE). For an exact sequence 0→A→E→B→0 of finite-part objects, the precise dual sequence is 0→Bd→Ed→Ad→TB→TE→TA→0 in B−β. The first three Chern coordinates transform by (ch⁡0,ch⁡1,ch⁡2)↦(−ch⁡0,ch⁡1,−ch⁡2), while ch⁡3(Ed)=ch⁡3(E)+length⁡(TE). No tilt-HN theorem, ordinary BG inequality, or polynomial-stability duality is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Full Axiom of Choice is retained from the actual coherent and regular-local suppliers.

[F1]

The exact mathematical inputs are Coherent duality and rational slope-tilt heart noetherianity, The Chern character and the Todd class, The Axiom of Choice. Their supplied interfaces are used below; no external tilt, polynomial-stability, or derived-dual theorem is assumed.

Proof

Given: Exactly the geometric data and explicit hypotheses of the Statement.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Let β be real and E∈Bβfin. Write F=H−1(E), T=H0(E). Then F is reflexive and μmax⁡(F)<β when F≠0. In fact Q=F∗∗/F is supported in dimension at most one; F∗∗,F∈Fβ and the exact coherent sequence gives a monomorphism Q→F[1]→E in Bβ. Since Q∈Cβ, it vanishes. Similarly a nonzero HN boundary part of F of slope β gives a monomorphism of its shift into E from Cβ, impossible. This proves both assertions.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

We claim that D(E) has standard cohomology only in degrees −1,0,1, with H1 zero-dimensional. Initially it has no cohomology below −1 or above 2: dualize F[1]→E→T, use regular-local dimension three and torsion-freeness of F (depth at least one, projective dimension at most two). Its H2 is supported at closed points by local global dimension. If H2 were nonzero, its quotient to a residue-field sheaf would give a nonzero composite D(E)→H2(D(E))[−2]→k(x)[−2]. Applying the involutive D produces a nonzero map k(x)^D→E, contradicting Hom(Cβ,E)=0. Hence H2=0.

3.1givenA1F1step 2.1algebra

Let G=H1(D(E)). At a point of codimension at most one, F is free and T has projective dimension at most one, so the same triangle gives no H1. Therefore G is supported in dimension at most one. If its one-dimensional part were nonzero, consider the canonical map D(E)→G[−1] and dualize. The source D(G[−1]) has cohomology K=Ext2(G,OX) in degree zero and Ext3(G,OX) in degree one. Thus the canonical map K→D(G[−1])→E exists. At a generic codimension-two point where G is nonzero, the local ring is regular of dimension two and G has finite length; Koszul duality and finite-length dévissage show that D(G[−1]) there is exactly its nonzero Ext² module. The map is nonzero there, since the original truncation map induces an isomorphism on its highest cohomology and derived duality is faithful. This yields a nonzero map from K, a dimension-at-most-one sheaf, to E, again impossible. Hence G is zero-dimensional.

4.1givenA1F1step 3.1algebra

Define

5.1givenA1F1step 4.1algebra

Ed=τ≤0 D(E), TE=H1 D(E).

6.1givenA1F1step 5.1algebra

This gives a canonical triangle Ed→D(E)→TE[−1]. We now prove Ed∈B−β, not just that it is a two-term complex. Dualizing the cohomology triangle gives H−1 D(E)=T∗. Its maximal slope is less than −β by ordinary slope duality on T's torsion-free quotient, so it belongs to F−β. Also H0D(E) fits into an exact sequence with a torsion image of Ext1(T,OX) as its subobject and an image K inside F* as its quotient; F*/K is supported in codimension at least two, being a subsheaf of Ext2(T,OX). The HN slopes of K equal those of F*, whose minimum exceeds −β. Thus H0D(E)∈T−β. This proves the asserted heart membership. The statement remains valid when F or T is zero.

7.1givenA1F1step 6.1algebra

Dualize the last triangle. Since D(TE[−1])=TED[−1], it gives a canonical exact sequence in Bβ

8.1givenA1F1step 7.1algebra

0→E→Esat:=D(Ed)→TED→0.

9.1givenA1F1step 8.1algebra

In particular Esat has standard cohomology only in degrees −1,0. For any K of dimension at most one,

10.1givenA1F1step 9.1algebra

Hom(K,Esat)=Hom(Ed,D(K))=0,

11.1givenA1F1step 10.1algebra

because Ed has cohomology in degrees at most zero and D(K) in degrees at least one. For a torsion-free slope-semistable G of slope β, a map G[1]→Esat factors through E: Hom(G[1],TED)=0 by negative ordinary Ext. It is therefore zero. Every object of Cβ is an extension of such a G[1] by a dimension-at-most-one sheaf. Thus Esat∈Bβfin.

12.1givenA1F1step 11.1algebra

The dual truncation itself lies in B−βfin. For K of dimension at most one, use Hom(K,Ed)=Hom(Esat,D(K))=0 by the same standard degree argument. For a slope-semistable G of slope −β,

13.1givenA1F1step 12.1algebra

Hom(G[1],Ed)=Hom(Esat,RHom(G,OX)).

14.1givenA1F1step 13.1algebra

The standard degree-zero term G* has slope β, so G∗[1]∈Bβ and Hom(Esat,G∗)=0 by negative-heart orthogonality. The remaining terms of RHom(G,OX) have standard cohomology in degrees at least one, giving no maps from Esat. This proves the other necessary Hom vanishing, and hence the finite-part assertion.

15.1givenA1F1step 14.1algebra

The saturation is finite and universal. Given 0→E→U→Z→0 in Bβ with Z zero-dimensional and with no nonzero zero-dimensional subobject of U, every Cβ−subobject of U has intersection zero with E and hence injects into Z; it would be zero-dimensional, so must vanish. Thus U∈Bβfin. Since D(Z)=ZD[−2], the dual map induces a canonical isomorphism τ≤0D(U)≅τ≤0D(E)=Ed. Apply the preceding saturation construction to U to obtain the canonical injection U→D(Ed)=Esat over E. It is unique: two such maps differ by a map Z→Esat, which is zero. Consequently length(U/E)≤length(TE), uniformly for every such extension. No existence of a maximal extension is assumed; Esat is constructed by two actual derived duals and one standard truncation.

16.1givenA1F1step 15.1algebra

Functoriality also gives the exact dual sequence. From an exact 0→A→E→B→0 of finite-part objects, take tilted cohomology of D(B)→D(E)→D(A). Because each D object is its dual truncation plus a zero-dimensional degree-one term, the result is

17.1givenA1F1step 16.1algebra

0→Bd→Ed→Ad→TB→TE→TA→0

18.1givenA1F1step 17.1algebra∎

in B−β. In particular the injection of the dual of a finite-part quotient is genuine; no dual of an arbitrary heart exact sequence is claimed exact without the defect terms. The first three numerical coordinates transform as (C0,C1,C2)↦(−C0,C1,−C2); ch3(Ed)=ch3(E)+length(TE).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources