How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inductive horseshoe step
Statement
Suppose is the short exact sequence of current kernels arising in the horseshoe construction. If the tails of projective resolutions of and are already chosen, then one more degree of the horseshoe construction produces a projective object surjecting onto and a new short exact sequence of next kernels.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The current short exact kernel sequence and the next projective terms of the two side resolutions.
The degree-zero horseshoe construction produces the next surjection from a direct sum of projectives (The degree-zero horseshoe lift).
The kernel of that new surjection again sits in a short exact sequence with the two side kernels (The horseshoe kernel fits into a short exact sequence).
Proof
Apply [L1] to the short exact sequence and to the degree-zero tails of the already chosen projective resolutions of and . This produces a projective object together with an epimorphism .
Applying [L2] to that new surjection gives the next short exact sequence of kernels. Therefore the horseshoe construction advances by one degree.