Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)audited 2026-07-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation

Statement

The relation (a,b)∼(c,d)  ⟺  a+d=b+c on N×N (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals) is an equivalence relation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The relation (a,b)∼(c,d)  ⟺  a+d=b+c on N×N.

[A1]

Addition on N is commutative and associative.

[A2]

Cancellation in N: if x+z=y+z then x=y.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1

Reflexivity: for any (a,b) we have a+b=b+a, so (a,b)∼(a,b).

1.2A1

Symmetry: suppose (a,b)∼(c,d), i.e. a+d=b+c. Then c+b=d+a, which is the defining equation for (c,d)∼(a,b).

1.3given

Suppose (a,b)∼(c,d) and (c,d)∼(e,f), i.e. a+d=b+c and c+f=d+e.

2.1step 1.3algebra

Adding the two equations: (a+d)+(c+f)=(b+c)+(d+e).

3.1step 2.1A1

Regrouping both sides: (a+f)+(c+d)=(b+e)+(c+d).

4.1step 3.1A2

Cancelling (c+d): a+f=b+e, so (a,b)∼(e,f); the relation is transitive.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1∎

The relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, hence an equivalence relation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources