How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite intersection of primary submodules with one radical is primary
Statement
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let . Let be -primary submodules. Then is also -primary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring , a finitely generated left -module , an integer , a prime ideal , and -primary submodules .
A proper submodule is primary exactly when and imply for some (Primary submodules are exactly quotients with nilpotent zero divisors).
A primary submodule is -primary when (Primary submodules and primary ideals).
Proof
Because , one has , so is proper. Suppose and . Choose with . Since is primary, [L1] gives with , so by [L2].
For each , step 1.1 gives , so choose with . The nonempty finite list has a maximum , and then for every , hence . By [L1], the proper submodule is primary.
If , the same finite-maximum argument as in step 2.1 gives a power of in , so . Conversely, if a power of annihilates , it also annihilates every because , so . Thus , and [L2] makes -primary.