Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normal bundle of the zero locus of a transverse section

Statement

Assume ACω. Let E→M be a smooth real vector bundle of rank r over a boundaryless smooth n-manifold M, with zero section s0, and let s:M→E be a smooth section transverse to the embedded submanifold s0(M)⊆E. Then Z=s−1(s0(M)) is closed. If r≤n, it is an embedded submanifold of dimension n−r (possibly empty); if r>n, it is empty, without a negative-dimensional submanifold assertion. For every r≥0, the vertical part of ds induces a canonical isomorphism of smooth vector bundles over Z νZ=TM∣Z/TZ  ≅  E∣Z. If Z=∅, the displayed quotient and restriction are empty bundle sets and their isomorphism is the unique empty bundle map; the normal set may carry the specified rank-r empty-bundle structure without a claim that Z has dimension n−r when r>n. If M and the fibres of E are R-oriented, orient νZ by transporting the fibre orientation of E∣Z through this isomorphism, and orient Z so that its tangent determinant followed by this normal determinant is the ambient determinant. Over F2 all these orientations are canonical.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a smooth rank-r real vector bundle E→M over a boundaryless smooth n-manifold, its zero section s0 and a smooth section s transverse to the embedded submanifold s0(M)⊆E.

[F1]

The zero section 0M:M→E, p↦0p, is a smooth embedding (The zero section is a smooth embedding).

[F2]

The normal-bundle set of an embedded submanifold is the fibrewise quotient of the ambient tangent bundle by the tangent bundle (Normal and conormal bundles of an embedded submanifold).

[F3]

The fibrewise quotient of a smooth bundle by a smooth subbundle is a smooth vector bundle, and constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over one base are smooth subbundles (A vector bundle quotient by a subbundle is a smooth vector bundle, Constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over one base are subbundles).

[F4]

A smooth rank-r vector bundle has r-dimensional real fibres and local trivializations (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[F5]

Suppose F:Mm→Nn is smooth and transverse to an embedded submanifold Z⊆N of codimension c. If c≤m, then F−1(Z) is an embedded submanifold of codimension c, possibly empty, with the stated tangent formula at each point; if c>m, then F−1(Z)=∅ (The transverse preimage theorem).

[F6]

A smooth map F:M→N is transverse to an embedded submanifold Z⊆N when dFp(TpM)+TF(p)Z=TF(p)N for every p∈F−1(Z) (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).

[F7]

The pullback f∗E of a smooth bundle along a smooth map is the fibre product {(q,e):f(q)=π(e)} with fibre over q canonically Ef(q), and it is again a smooth vector bundle of the same rank (Pullback vector bundles as fibre products, The pullback fibre product is a smooth vector bundle).

[F8]

A vector bundle map over f is a smooth map Φ:E→F with πF∘Φ=f∘πE that is fibrewise linear (Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map).

[F9]

For an embedded submanifold, any two of the orientations of the ambient tangent bundle, the tangent bundle and the transverse normal bundle determine the third; in this pair the convention is that a positive tangent basis followed by a positive normal basis is positive in the ambient (An oriented transverse normal bundle orients an embedded submanifold).

[F10]

The empty space is a smooth manifold of every nonnegative dimension; the empty projection has empty-cover local trivializations for every specified nonnegative rank, and its unique self-map gives the unique empty bundle isomorphism (Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces, Smooth fibre bundles and local trivializations, Bundle maps, sections, subbundles, and isomorphisms). The empty normal-bundle set is the empty coproduct of [F2], and the empty pullback is the fibre product of [F7].

Proof

Given: The data and transversality hypotheses in the Statement; every asserted dimension is nonnegative, and the empty bundle case is interpreted as specified there.

Proof technique: identify the pullback of the normal exact sequence along s with the normal sequence of the preimage.

1.1F1F2F3F4given

The zero section s0:M→E is a smooth embedding [F1], so by [F2] its normal bundle is the quotient νs0=TE∣s0(M)/T(s0(M)). The canonical splitting TE∣s0(M)≅TM⊕E along the zero section, whose vertical summand is the fibre direction, identifies this quotient with E as smooth bundles over M by [F3] and [F4]; moreover s0(M) is closed in E because in every bundle chart its complement is the open set of nonzero vectors.

2.1F1F2F4F5F6F7F10step 1.1casesalgebra

The zero section has codimension r by the bundle coordinates in step 1.1. Since s is transverse to it by [F6], the r>n branch of [F5] gives Z=∅ in that range. Its two normal-bundle sets are then empty: the normal quotient is the empty coproduct and E∣Z is the empty pullback. By [F10] their unique map is a smooth bundle isomorphism with the specified rank-r empty-bundle model; use the empty zero-dimensional structure on Z without asserting codimension r. The same empty-map conclusion holds if Z=∅ for r≤n, now with its allowed dimension n−r. In either case Z is closed and all pointwise tangent and orientation statements are vacuous. For r=0, the bundle has one zero vector in every fibre, so s=s0, Z=M and the normal identification is the canonical map between zero bundles. It remains to handle 1≤r≤n at actual zeros.

3.1F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1given

In this dimension range, [F5] makes Z=s−1(s0(M)) an embedded submanifold of codimension r; it is closed because s0(M) is closed and s is continuous, so dim⁡Z=n−r. The quotient map Dvs:TM∣Z→E∣Z has kernel TZ by [F5] and is surjective by transversality. In bundle charts it is the derivative of the local section components at their zeros, hence smooth; it induces a smooth fibrewise isomorphism TM∣Z/TZ→E∣Z, whose inverse is smooth by the inverse-matrix formula. Here E∣Z is the pullback along the inclusion Z↪M, not along the section s:M→E. Combining with step 1.1 gives the canonical isomorphism νZ≅E∣Z of smooth bundles over Z.

4.1F5F8F9F10step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Orientation clause. If Z is empty, the orientation data form the unique empty assignment, compatible with step 2.1. Otherwise the isomorphism of step 1.1 carries the orientation of E to the normal orientation of s0(M) induced by the ambient E and the zero-section orientation, by the third-orientation rule [F9] applied with the total-space orientation in which a positive tangent basis of s0(M) followed by a positive fibre basis is positive (the tangent-first convention of this pair). Pullback along s preserves this ordered determinant-line comparison because ds maps the normal directions of the transverse preimage isomorphically onto the normal directions of s0(M) by [F5] and [F8], and the induced orientation of Z in M is the one for which a positive tangent basis of Z followed by a positive normal basis is positive in M [F9]. Hence the orientation of νZ induced from M and Z corresponds to the supplied fibre orientation of E∣Z; over F2 the fibre orientation data at each actual point are canonical. No nonzero global generator is asserted over the empty base.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources