How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field
Statement
Let be an ordered field (Ordered field). There is a unique field homomorphism (Field homomorphism and embedding). On the integers it is given by (with and ), and on a rational written as with by . Moreover is injective and order-preserving, so it is an embedding of as an ordered subfield of , and it is the only field homomorphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An ordered field ; the field of The rationals form a totally ordered field, every element of which is or with integers . For an integer write for if and if .
is an ordered field; a nonzero with is positive exactly when (The rationals form a totally ordered field).
The canonical naturals satisfy for , is injective, , and (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
Sign rules: a product of positives is positive, and for one has iff (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication).
A field homomorphism preserves , , and , and hence , negation, and inverses (Field homomorphism and embedding).
Proof
Define on the integers by for and ; by [L2] this is additive and multiplicative on and sends .
For a rational with define , which makes sense because has an inverse.
Well-defined: if with , then in , so [L2] gives , and multiplying by the positive yields ; thus is independent of the representative.
Multiplicativity: for , one has , and , using and .
Additivity: with , , using the additive and multiplicative identities of [L2].
Positivity: if in with , then by [L1], so and by [L2], whence by [L3] and by [L4].
Uniqueness on : let be any field homomorphism; then , additivity forces for , and , , so on .
Unit: ; hence is a field homomorphism .
Order: for in we have , so by 2.3 and 2.4, that is ; thus is order-preserving.
Injectivity: if then or , and 3.2 forces ; so is injective, an embedding of ordered fields.
Uniqueness on : for , since preserves products and inverses; hence , so is the unique field homomorphism .