How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a prime and a nonzero integer : and ; holds exactly for ; exactly when ; ; and
Statement
Let be a prime (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ), let with , and write (The -adic valuation of a nonzero integer: the greatest with ). Powers are the natural powers of Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with in the commutative monoid ( is a commutative monoid whose group of units is ; equivalently holds exactly for and ), and means . Then:
- for every ; in particular and ;
- and ;
- for : if and only if ;
- for some with and ;
- if and only if ;
- and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime , a nonzero integer , and .
is the greatest with ; in particular , and fails for every (The -adic valuation of a nonzero integer: the greatest with ).
Exponent law in a monoid, for natural exponents: (Exponent laws in a group: and for all , and when and commute).
Divisibility is reflexive and transitive; implies ; and , , are equivalent (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on , and is linear: if and then for all integers ; also implies , and ).
means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
exactly when or ( is a commutative monoid whose group of units is ; equivalently holds exactly for and ).
Every prime satisfies (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
If and then ; and a product of two nonzero integers is nonzero (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
On : means for some (Order on the natural numbers); (Addition of natural numbers, The natural numbers (von Neumann)); and exactly when (On the order is membership: ); exactly when (Discreteness: is the immediate successor); and is a linear order, so it is antisymmetric and total ( is a linear order on ).
is a commutative ring, its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive and compatible with addition, and is injective, order preserving, with image the nonnegative integers and , (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers).
Induction on : a subset containing and closed under is all of (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
.
in , since is nonnegative and differs from ; hence , and .
Clause 1. by [L1], and , so would contradict the maximality of ; hence .
Clause 2, the other direction. If then belongs to the set of which is the greatest element, so .
Clause 0: for every . The set of such contains , since ; and if then has both factors , so the product is positive, hence by discreteness of the order on (a positive integer is with , so and ). By induction the set is all of , and in particular and .
Clause 2, one direction. Let and write with . Then , so ; with and transitivity, .
Clause 3. By [L1] fix with . Then , since . If , say , then , so , contradicting step 1.3. Hence .
If then : write , so .
Clause 4. If then by step 2.2. Conversely if then , so by step 1.4.
. If with , then by step 2.4 and transitivity, so or , contradicting step 1.2. So no satisfies , while ; the greatest such is .
. First , so by step 1.4 applied to . Next , where : otherwise for some , and cancelling gives , so , contradicting step 1.2. Hence by step 2.2, that is , and antisymmetry gives .
, because holds exactly when , so the two sets of exponents coincide.
Clauses 0 to 5 are established.
Remarks
-
Clause 3 is the working form. Every later proof on this page writes a nonzero integer as with and then argues about ; that is how for nonzero integers , and whenever , and are all nonzero gets additivity, and it is where Euclid's lemma enters.
-
The hypothesis is carried everywhere because is not defined: every power of divides , so there is no greatest exponent (The -adic valuation of a nonzero integer: the greatest with ).
-
Clause 2 says the exponents form an initial segment, which is what makes "the greatest with " the same as "the number of times divides ". Without it the maximum could in principle skip values.
Depends on
The -adic valuation of a nonzero integer: the greatest with
Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and
Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with
Exponent laws in a group: and for all , and when and commute
Semigroup and monoid
is a commutative monoid whose group of units is ; equivalently holds exactly for and
Divisibility in : when for some integer
Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on , and is linear: if and then for all integers ; also implies , and
The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation
The principle of mathematical induction
On the order is membership:
Discreteness: is the immediate successor
is a linear order on
Order on the natural numbers
Addition of natural numbers
The natural numbers (von Neumann)
The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
Arithmetic on the integers
Order on the integers
The integers form a commutative ring
The integers form a totally ordered ring
The naturals embed in the integers