How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primes of a localization avoid the denominator set
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be a multiplicative subset, and let be the localization map. Contraction sends each prime ideal of to a prime ideal of disjoint from , and extension sends each prime ideal of disjoint from back to a prime ideal of . These two operations are inverse and preserve strict inclusion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a multiplicative subset , and the localization map .
Ideals of correspond to -saturated ideals of , and primes correspond exactly to the prime ideals disjoint from (Ideals of correspond to -saturated ideals of , and prime ideals correspond to primes disjoint from ).
Proof
The prime-ideal part of [L1] says exactly that if , then is a prime ideal of disjoint from , and if with , then is a prime ideal of .
The same statement [L1] asserts that these assignments are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections. In particular they preserve strict inclusion.
Therefore primes of the localization are exactly the primes of that avoid the denominator set.