How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring
Statement
Every projective left or right module over an arbitrary unital ring is flat on its appropriate side. This implication requires no Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Given: a projective left -module ; the right-module case is symmetric.
The choice-free implication in Equivalent characterizations of projective modules supplies a split free cover : lift the identity of through its canonical free cover. Fix the resulting inclusion and retraction .
For any right module , the balanced pairing induces by Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups. Its inverse sends a finite-support tuple to . The two composites fix elementary tensors and coordinate generators, since . These identifications commute with homomorphisms in .
Direct sums of exact sequences are exact: kernels are computed coordinatewise, and an element of the kernel has finite support, so finitely many preimages suffice to lift it from the preceding term. Finite choices require no AC. Thus step 2.1 shows that is exact.
Tensoring and gives natural maps with composite the identity. If is a cycle in a sequence tensored with , include it into the sequence tensored with , lift it there by step 3.1, and retract that lift using . This proves exactness after tensoring with , including the endpoint conditions. Hence is flat by Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring.
For a projective right module, use its split right free cover and the balanced isomorphism , , whose inverse is . The same coordinatewise and retract arguments prove right flatness, without invoking tensor symmetry or choice.