Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pythagoras and finite orthogonal sums

Statement

Let x1,…,xn be pairwise orthogonal vectors in a real or complex inner-product space, that is ⟨xi,xj⟩=0 whenever i≠j (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement). Then

∥∑j=1nxj∥2=∑j=1n∥xj∥2,

the empty sum on the right being 0 at n=0.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Orthogonality means ⟨x,y⟩=0, the pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second, and ∥v∥2=⟨v,v⟩ (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[A2]

Every inner-product norm satisfies the parallelogram law (The parallelogram law).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Pairwise orthogonal vectors x1,…,xn in a real or complex inner-product space.

1.1A1

At n=0 the sum is 0 and both sides vanish, and at n=1 the identity is ∥x1∥2=∥x1∥2.

1.2A1A2algebra

For two orthogonal vectors x,y, expansion gives ∥x+y∥2=∥x∥2+⟨x,y⟩+⟨y,x⟩+∥y∥2=∥x∥2+∥y∥2, and the same computation with y replaced by −y shows that the sum of a finite orthogonal family may be split off one term at a time.

2.1step 1.2step 1.1A1algebra

Suppose the identity holds for orthogonal families of n−1 terms, n≥2, and let x1,…,xn be pairwise orthogonal; the partial sum s=∑j=1n−1xj satisfies ⟨s,xn⟩=∑j=1n−1⟨xj,xn⟩=0 by linearity in the first argument, and ∥s∥2=∑j=1n−1∥xj∥2 by the induction hypothesis, so ∥∑j=1nxj∥2=∥s+xn∥2=∥s∥2+∥xn∥2=∑j=1n∥xj∥2.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Induction on n from the cases n=0,1 of step 1.1 and the induction step of step 2.1 proves the identity for every n, so pairwise orthogonal vectors satisfy ∥∑j=1nxj∥2=∑j=1n∥xj∥2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources