How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Minimal Dirac magnetic square and formal Pauli benchmark
Statement
Let be a particle mass in kilograms, its charge in coulombs, and a smooth spatial vector potential with components in tesla-metres. Use standard Cartesian coordinates measured in metres and write . Let be the alternating symbol with , and sum repeated spatial indices from to . Define and ; its smooth components are in tesla.
Let be the common invariant test domain. In this item, “common core” refers only to this shared domain of the displayed differential expressions; no operator-theoretic core property for a closure is asserted. Define the dimensionless finite matrices and use of QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions. On , define These maps preserve . The components have units and has units joules. Define the operator expressions Here , and denotes composition on . On , the identities are The operator maps to itself and has units .
For commuting formal indeterminates over , define the first-order square-root coefficient by Comparing the coefficient of gives ; substituting for gives the formal first-degree correction , with no operator square-root assertion. Its spin term is , where , , and . The magnetic-moment dot product below uses the same componentwise sum convention.
Under the coefficient convention and , equality of the formal coefficients as a linear function of gives for the minimal tree-level term. Here has units joules and has units . No magnetic self-adjoint closure, full spectrum, operator square-root theorem, radiative correction, or empirical prediction is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume , , smooth with the component units stated above, and the common invariant test domain defined in the Statement. Use the finite Dirac matrices and SI constants stated above.
QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: is in metres per second, is in joule-seconds, is in coulombs, and spatial is in tesla-metres.
Proof
For , expand . The second derivatives and products cancel; the remaining derivative terms are by the stated alternating-symbol and summation conventions. Smoothness of ensures each multiplication and differentiation maps to itself.
In , the coefficient of in is . The defining identity in the Statement sets this equal to , so since . Substituting for , the spin part of is .
Direct multiplication of the displayed matrices gives , , , and ; each reversed product has the opposite sign. Thus . Block multiplication gives , , and . These fixed constant matrices commute with every . Expand . The term in the derived block product is the operator defined in the Statement. Its antisymmetric term is because . The cross terms with cancel by , and . This proves the displayed square identity on ; no product outside that domain is used.
The coefficient of the term linear in is . Equating it with as a formal coefficient identity gives , including the zero-charge specialization of that identity. This is only a formal lowest-order coefficient comparison, not an operator or empirical conclusion.