Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ideal linear Penning mode-frequency invariant

Statement

Let q≠0 be a signed charge in coulombs, M>0 a rest-mass energy in joules, c>0 the speed of light in metres per second, and B∈R3∖{0} a constant magnetic-field vector in teslas. Set m:=M/c2>0. Let K∈R3×3 be a real symmetric matrix with tr⁡K=0, with units volts per square metre, and define the quadratic scalar potential Φ(r):=12rTKr for r∈R3 in metres. Thus ∂i∂jΦ=Kij and ∑i=13∂i2Φ=tr⁡K=0. Put α:=qc2/M=q/m, D:=−αK, and define C:R3→R3 by Cw:=α w×B. The ideal linear model is the real linear map A:R3×R3→R3×R3, A(r,v):=(v,Dr+Cv), equivalently A=(0I3DC). Equivalently, its equations are r˙=v and v˙=−(qc2/M)Kr+(qc2/M)v×B. The entries of r,v are their real numerical coordinates in the fixed SI units. A state solution on an open time interval I⊆R is a C1 map y=(r,v):I→R3×R3 satisfying the displayed equations for every t∈I. Here v has units metres per second, D has units inverse seconds squared, and C has units inverse seconds.

Define a linear mode to be a complex eigenvector of the complexified state matrix A; its eigenvalue +iω or −iω gives the time factor e±iωt, with angular frequency ω>0 in radians per second. Assume the complexification of A is diagonalizable with eigenvalues +iω1,−iω1,+iω2,−iω2,+iω3,−iω3, where each ωj is counted with its eigenvalue multiplicity. Define the free cyclotron angular frequency ωc:=∣q∣c2∣B∣/M. Then

ωc2=ω12+ω22+ω32.

Consequently, if νc:=ωc/(2π) and νj:=ωj/(2π) are the corresponding ordinary frequencies in hertz, then νc2=ν12+ν22+ν32. The claim is conditional on the stated uniform-field, harmonic-quadrupole, and complete stable-mode hypotheses; it is an identity for this linear model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Use the exact planned QFT-MX01 mass-energy convention below, together with the real linear model and spectral hypothesis stated in this item.

[L1]

QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions (QFT-MX01): the current draft Definition at items/def-qft-example-data.md says, “Write M=mc2 for rest energy in joules,” with c>0 in metres per second. Its dependency list is empty. Its proof checks the listed unit conventions, but the draft has no independent acceptance stamp. The actual statement matches the use m=M/c2 here; the theorem does not rely on the supplier for any dynamics or spectral result.

[A1]

Model data: q≠0, M>0, c>0, B≠0, K=KT, and tr⁡K=0; m=M/c2, α=qc2/M, D=−αK, Cw=α w×B, and A=(0I3DC).

[A2]

Spectral hypothesis: A is diagonalizable over C with eigenvalues ±iωj, j=1,2,3, where every ωj>0; repeated frequencies are allowed and counted with multiplicity.

Proof

1.1L1A1algebra

By [L1], the inertial-mass coefficient in the SI equation is q/m=qc2/M=α. Block multiplication gives A2=(DCCDD+C2), so tr⁡(A2)=2tr⁡D+tr⁡(C2).

1.2A2algebra

By [A2], write the complexification as A=PΛP−1, where Λ is diagonal with the six stated eigenvalues. Then A2=PΛ2P−1; the finite-sum identity tr⁡(XY)=∑k,ℓXkℓYℓk=tr⁡(YX) gives tr⁡(A2)=tr⁡(Λ2)=∑j=13((iωj)2+(−iωj)2)=−2∑j=13ωj2.

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

Since D=−αK and tr⁡K=0, tr⁡D=0. In the fixed right-handed Cartesian coordinates, C has matrix α(0B3−B2−B30B1B2−B10), so the diagonal entries of C2 are −α2(B22+B32), −α2(B12+B32), and −α2(B12+B22). Therefore tr⁡(C2)=−2α2∣B∣2=−2ωc2 and tr⁡D=0 gives tr⁡(A2)=−2ωc2 by step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra

Equating the trace calculations in steps 2.1 and 1.2 and dividing by −2 gives ωc2=ω12+ω22+ω32.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

Dividing the angular-frequency identity in step 3.1 by (2π)2 gives the same sum-of-squares identity for νc,ν1,ν2,ν3.

Remarks

This is a mathematical deduction about the displayed first-order matrix. It does not prove that an actual trap realizes the model or spectral hypothesis. The statement excludes higher spatial multipoles, magnetic-field inhomogeneity, relativistic shifts, radiation or cavity shifts, and nonlinear motion. The Brown–Gabrielse derivation treats the broader quadratic model with field misalignment and ellipticity; the trace proof above supplies the local argument under the stated matrix hypotheses.

The current draft Definition QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions has been inspected and its mass-energy interface matches this use. This conditional matrix deduction does not certify the supplier or any physical trap.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 1 level

Sources