Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular normal-ordering change is an exact star isomorphism

Statement

Let W∈D′(X×X), X=Rd, and let K∈D′(X×X) be symmetric under interchange of its variables. Define ΓKF(ϕ)=⟨K,F(2)(ϕ)⟩,αK=exp⁡ ⁣(η2ΓK)=∑j≥0(η/2)jj!ΓKj on Preg(X)[η]. Each sum is finite on each polynomial because ΓK lowers degree by two. Then αK is invertible with inverse α−K, and αK(F⋆WG)=αK(F)⋆W+KαK(G) for all regular polynomial functionals F,G. Thus the change from W to W+K is an exact algebra isomorphism on this regular class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: [F1]–[F4], a symmetric continuous bidistribution K, and the formal-parameter convention of [A1].

[A1]

The parameter η is formal and fixed by complex conjugation.

[F1]

The regular coefficient kernels and their functional derivatives are smooth and compactly supported; compactly supported complex Riemann integrals are evaluated componentwise as defined in Regular polynomial field functional algebra, and the coefficient representation is unique (Tensor-product tests are dense in smooth compact kernel topology).

[F2]

Tensor products of distributions pair independently and iterated pairings associate (Tensor product distributions and iterated pairings).

[F3]

Distributional pairings with smooth common-compact-support parameter families are smooth, with derivatives passed through the pairing (Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families).

[F4]

For every continuous bidistribution W, the regular contraction product ⋆W is well defined and associative, with finite sums (Regular Wick-star contractions are well defined and associative).

Proof

Given: [A1]–[F4], W, and symmetric K.

1.1A1F1F2F3construct

For a homogeneous coefficient of degree m, one application of ΓK contracts two derivative variables against K, leaving a smooth compact kernel by [F1]–[F3]. It lowers the polynomial degree by two; therefore ΓKjF=0 when 2j>deg⁡F, so αKF is a finite sum in Preg(X)[η]. The same finite argument defines α−K.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra

For this computation set Ef(s,ϕ):=∑m≥0smℓf(ϕ)m/m! as a formal generating series. Each second derivative contracts to K(f,f)Ef. Coefficientwise this gives αKEf(s)=exp⁡ ⁣(ηs22K(f,f))Ef(s), where the exponential is its formal power series; each coefficient used below involves only finitely many derivatives.

3.1step 2.1F4algebra

On two auxiliary generators, the left side of the asserted identity has the scalar factor exp⁡ ⁣(ηstW(f,g)+η2K(sf+tg,sf+tg)). The right side has factor exp⁡ ⁣(ηs22K(f,f)+ηt22K(g,g)+ηst(W+K)(f,g)). Symmetry and bilinearity of K make these exponents equal.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1algebra∎

Comparing coefficients of s,t in step 3.1 first proves the identity for powers of linear functionals. Replacing f by ∑jsjfj and comparing the coefficient of s1⋯sm, and doing the same independently for g, proves it for every finite product of distinct linear functionals. Each fixed coefficient is continuous in its smooth compact kernels by [F2]–[F4]; the density in [F1] therefore extends the identity to all F,G∈Preg(X). For an input of degree d, the coefficient of ΓKr in αKα−K is multiplied by ∑j=0r(rj)(−1)r−j=(1−1)r, which is zero for r>0 and one for r=0. The sums are finite because ΓK lowers degree by two, so αKα−K=I; the reverse composition is identical.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources