Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular point and exchange logarithmic derivative

Statement

Let t(u) and U be the transfer matrix and cyclic shift defined by the ordered monodromy construction. Use the periodic convention PN,N+1:=PN,1. Then t(0)=iNU,i t′(0)t(0)−1=∑j=1NPj,j+1. In particular, t(0) is invertible. The derivative is with respect to the dimensionless complex parameter u.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer N≥3 and the finite-dimensional spaces and operators of Ordered auxiliary-space monodromy.

[F1]

Ordered auxiliary-space monodromy: Ta(u)=RaN(u)⋯Ra1(u), t(u)=tr⁡aTa(u), Raj(u)=uI+iPaj, and U sends v1⊗⋯⊗vN to vN⊗v1⊗⋯⊗vN−1.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

At u=0, every factor is Raj(0)=iPaj, so t(0)=iNtr⁡a(PaN⋯Pa1). On an elementary chain tensor ej1⊗⋯⊗ejN, start the auxiliary factor at each basis vector ea in turn. The swaps pass ej1,…,ejN successively to the auxiliary factor and shift the preceding entries one site right; the auxiliary trace retains exactly the term with ea=ejN. The output is therefore ejN⊗ej1⊗⋯⊗ejN−1. These tensors form a basis, hence tr⁡a(PaN⋯Pa1)=U. As U permutes a basis, it is invertible, proving the first identity and invertibility of t(0).

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Differentiate the finite product defining Ta(u) and use Raj′(0)=Iaj. For each m, let Dm=tr⁡a(PaN⋯Pa,m+1Pa,m−1⋯Pa1), with the factor Pam omitted. Following the auxiliary basis vector through the remaining swaps and taking its trace gives, for 2≤m<N, Dm(ej1⊗⋯⊗ejN)=ejN⊗(⨂r=1m−2ejr)⊗ejm⊗ejm−1⊗(⨂r=m+1N−1ejr). An empty tensor block in this display is omitted. For m=N the same calculation gives ejN−1⊗ej1⊗⋯⊗ejN−2⊗ejN; for m=1 it gives ej1⊗ejN⊗ej2⊗⋯⊗ejN−1. In each case this is exactly UPm−1,m applied to the input, with P0,1:=PN,1. Since the elementary tensors form a basis, Dm=UPm−1,m as operators. Thus t′(0)=iN−1∑m=1NUPm−1,m.

3.1givenF1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

From step 1.1, t(0)−1=i−NU−1. The definition of U shows UPm−1,mU−1=Pm,m+1 for 2≤m≤N, while UPN,1U−1=P1,2. Therefore t′(0)t(0)−1=i−1∑m=1NPm,m+1=−i∑m=1NPm,m+1. Multiplication by i proves the claimed logarithmic-derivative identity.

Remarks

The statement uses the ordered monodromy RaN⋯Ra1 and the stated orientation of U. Reversing either convention can change the direction of the cyclic shift and must be accompanied by a corresponding reindexing of the periodic bonds.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources