How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The spectrum of a quotient is a closed subspace
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let , and let be the quotient map. Then contraction along is a homeomorphism from onto the closed subset .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , and the quotient map .
Contraction along is an inclusion-preserving bijection from onto , with inverse (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal).
In a Zariski spectrum, the closed sets are precisely the vanishing sets (The vanishing sets define the Zariski topology on the prime spectrum).
A subset of is closed in the subspace topology exactly when it has the form for some ideal .
Proof
By [L1], contraction gives a bijection .
Let be an ideal of containing . If has contraction , then Therefore Since , this is closed in the subspace .
By [L2], every closed subset of has the form for some ideal . Writing , one has , so step 1.2 shows that sends every closed subset of to a closed subset of .
Conversely, let be closed. By [A1], for some ideal . Since contains , step 1.2 gives so also carries closed sets to closed sets.
The bijection and its inverse both preserve closed sets, so is a homeomorphism from onto the closed subspace .