How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The radical of an ideal is an ideal
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be an ideal. Then is an ideal of containing . If is another ideal with , then . Moreover,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal , and, for the order-preservation clause, an ideal with .
An element lies in exactly when some positive power lies in (The radical of an ideal).
In a commutative ring, for every natural number (The binomial theorem over an arbitrary commutative ring).
Proof
If , then , so by [L1]. Thus . If and , choose with . Then , so .
Let . Choose with and , and set . By [L2], every term of has the form . For each , either or ; otherwise and , which would force . Hence each term lies in , so and .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that is an ideal containing . If and , any power of lying in also lies in , so . Thus radical is order-preserving.
If , choose with , and then choose with . By [L1], this means . Together with step 2.1 applied to , this proves .
The radical construction therefore sends ideals to radical ideals, contains the original ideal, and is order-preserving and idempotent.