How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Submultiplicative root limit
Statement
Let be a positive-indexed family of nonnegative real numbers satisfying the submultiplicative inequality
Then the -indexed sequence () converges in . Writing the limit of the positive-indexed root family for this sequence limit,
The case of a vanishing term is included: if for some , then for all and both sides equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive-indexed family of reals with and for all ; put and extend the inequality by this convention, so that . Define for ; no zeroth root is defined.
For every and there is a unique with ; moreover and when (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
For and : if and only if , and if and only if . Consequently and implies , since both sides are nonnegative and have the same -th power (Monotonicity of and of , Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
For a sequence of reals the limit superior and limit inferior are elements of with , and converges to exactly when (Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as and in , A real sequence converges to iff , and diverges to iff both equal ).
If eventually, then and (If eventually then and ).
For every real , the -indexed sequence converges to (For every , ).
Proof
Put , a real number in because is finite and every term is ; by definition of the infimum, for every .
If for some then for every : writing with , the hypothesis and the convention give , while by assumption.
Now suppose for every . Fix , put and ; then for every , writing with and , iterated submultiplicativity gives .
Suppose for some . Then for all by [step 1.2] and [L1], and because the term occurs in the set whose infimum is ; hence for and .
With as in [step 1.3] the bound holds for and the constant : indeed by the integer index laws, and the correction factor satisfies when (then makes ) and when , so in both cases .
On the other hand every term satisfies by [step 1.1], so the liminf clause of [L4] applied to the constant sequence gives , that is .
Define the positive constant . Combining [step 1.3] and [step 2.2] gives , hence for every , taking -th roots by [L2].
Apply [L5] to . Substituting in step 3.1 gives whenever . Since , for every real the inequality holds eventually; hence eventually, and [L4] gives .
Since was arbitrary in [step 4.1] and , one has for every , hence .
In the positive case, [step 5.1] and [step 2.3] yield , so all three (for the sequence ) are equal to and by [L3]; in the vanishing case [step 2.1] gives the same conclusion. Hence in all cases .