Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Submultiplicative root limit

Statement

Let (un)n≥1 be a positive-indexed family of nonnegative real numbers satisfying the submultiplicative inequality

um+n  ≤  um unfor all m,n≥1.

Then the N-indexed sequence vj:=uj+11/(j+1) (j≥0) converges in R. Writing the limit of the positive-indexed root family for this sequence limit,

lim⁡n→∞un1/n  =  inf⁡n≥1un1/n.

The case of a vanishing term is included: if uk=0 for some k≥1, then un=0 for all n≥k and both sides equal 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive-indexed family (un)n≥1 of reals with un≥0 and um+n≤umun for all m,n≥1; put u0:=1 and extend the inequality by this convention, so that um+0=um≤um u0. Define vj=uj+11/(j+1) for j∈N; no zeroth root is defined.

[L1]

For every a≥0 and n≥1 there is a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a; moreover 01/n=0 and a1/n>0 when a>0 (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a).

[L2]

For x,y≥0 and n≥1: x≤y if and only if xn≤yn, and x<y if and only if xn<yn. Consequently (xy)1/n=x1/ny1/n and x≤y implies x1/n≤y1/n, since both sides are nonnegative and have the same n-th power (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a).

[L3]

For a sequence (xk) of reals the limit superior and limit inferior are elements of R‾ with lim inf⁡kxk≤lim sup⁡kxk, and (xk) converges to L∈R exactly when lim inf⁡kxk=lim sup⁡kxk=L (Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as inf⁡nsup⁡k≥nxk and sup⁡ninf⁡k≥nxk in R‾, A real sequence converges to L∈R iff lim inf⁡xk=lim sup⁡xk=L, and diverges to ±∞ iff both equal ±∞).

[L4]

If xk≤yk eventually, then lim sup⁡kxk≤lim sup⁡kyk and lim inf⁡kxk≤lim inf⁡kyk (If xk≤yk eventually then lim sup⁡xk≤lim sup⁡yk and lim inf⁡xk≤lim inf⁡yk).

[L5]

For every real c>0, the N-indexed sequence dj=c1/(j+1) converges to 1 (For every a>0, a1/n→1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

Put L:=inf⁡{ un1/n:n≥1 }, a real number in [0,∞) because u11/1=u1 is finite and every term is ≥0; by definition of the infimum, un1/n≥L for every n≥1.

1.2givenalgebra

If uk=0 for some k≥1 then un=0 for every n≥k: writing n=k+(n−k) with n−k≥0, the hypothesis and the convention u0=1 give un≤ukun−k=0, while un≥0 by assumption.

1.3givenL1algebra

Now suppose un>0 for every n≥1. Fix k≥1, put t:=uk1/k>0 and Ck:=max⁡{ur:0≤r<k}>0; then for every n≥k, writing n=qk+r with q≥1 and 0≤r<k, iterated submultiplicativity gives un≤ukq ur≤ukq Ck.

2.1step 1.2step 1.1L1L3

Suppose uk=0 for some k. Then un1/n=0 for all n≥k by [step 1.2] and [L1], and L=0 because the term uk1/k=0 occurs in the set whose infimum is L; hence vj=0 for j≥k−1 and vj→0=L.

2.2step 1.3L1L2algebra

With t=uk1/k>0 as in [step 1.3] the bound ukq≤tn Bk holds for n=qk+r≥k and the constant Bk:=max⁡(1,t−k): indeed ukq=(tk)q=tkq=tn−r by the integer index laws, and the correction factor satisfies t−r≤t−k≤Bk when t≤1 (then r<k makes t−r≤t−k) and t−r≤1≤Bk when t≥1, so in both cases tn−r=tn t−r≤tn Bk.

2.3step 1.1L4

On the other hand every term satisfies vj=uj+11/(j+1)≥L by [step 1.1], so the liminf clause of [L4] applied to the constant sequence L gives L=lim inf⁡jL≤lim inf⁡jvj, that is lim inf⁡jvj≥L.

3.1step 1.3step 2.2L1L2

Define the positive constant Dk:=max⁡(1,t−k) Ck. Combining [step 1.3] and [step 2.2] gives un≤tnDk, hence un1/n≤t Dk1/n for every n≥k, taking n-th roots by [L2].

4.1step 3.1L4L5algebra

Apply [L5] to dj=Dk1/(j+1). Substituting n=j+1 in step 3.1 gives vj≤tdj whenever j+1≥k. Since dj→1, for every real ε>0 the inequality dj≤1+ε holds eventually; hence vj≤t(1+ε) eventually, and [L4] gives lim sup⁡jvj≤t(1+ε).

5.1step 4.1step 1.1algebra

Since ε>0 was arbitrary in [step 4.1] and t=uk1/k, one has lim sup⁡jvj≤uk1/k for every k≥1, hence lim sup⁡jvj≤L.

6.1step 2.1step 5.1step 2.3L3∎

In the positive case, [step 5.1] and [step 2.3] yield lim sup⁡≤L≤lim inf⁡≤lim sup⁡, so all three (for the sequence v) are equal to L and vj→L by [L3]; in the vanishing case [step 2.1] gives the same conclusion. Hence in all cases lim⁡nun1/n=inf⁡n≥1un1/n.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources