How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every uniformity has a base of symmetric entourages
Statement
If is a uniformity on , then its symmetric entourages form a filter base: for every there is a symmetric with . More generally, for every entourage and every integer , there is a symmetric entourage whose -fold composite satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A uniformity on , an entourage , and an integer .
A uniformity is a filter whose members are closed under inverse and admit square roots (Uniform space in the entourage formulation).
A nonempty, proper family that refines every pair of its members is a filter base (Filter base and the filter it generates).
Proof
Choose with , and put .
Put . By finitely iterating the square-root axiom, choose entourages such that for , and put .
The set is an entourage, since and a filter is closed under intersections; also and , because every entourage contains the diagonal.
The entourage is symmetric and . Induction on gives for , hence . Since every entourage contains the diagonal and , one may insert diagonal factors to obtain .
Thus symmetric entourages refine every entourage; their intersections are symmetric entourages and none is empty because each contains the diagonal, so they form a filter base by [L1].
Therefore symmetric entourages form a base and admit the asserted finite-composite control.